3

I am a final year PhD in a STEM field. My PhD research field is fairly stagnant with less scope of future growth. I had chosen this topic because I was interested in the field during my masters and did not investigate seriously about the future prospects in the field.

Now I totally regret it. I managed to publish just 1 publication during my 5 years of PhD, and am planning to submit 2 more. There was no scope getting an internship in my research area and while searching for industrial positions, I have found that such positions are also nonexistent. Lot of red flags for a research topic.

I wish I could have been more serious while investigating for PhD positions. I could have done many things differently. I want to be in academia. And I am looking to switching to a different field during my postdoc to make my profile better. How should I approach a prospective professor if I have nothing to show competency in the new field? Is it even possible, if there's an overlap of just a simulation technique between my work during PhD and the field I want to work in?

  • 2
    Are you sure your field is dead, or maybe it's a usual panic attack of an academic that is obsessed with always "being in the cutting edge of research"? – Dilworth Sep 14 at 21:22
  • The title may be substantially misleading: it would/could most likely be read as you're thinking about resurrecting the field you're working in by changing the field's attitudes or directions. Reading your question, I think a better title would end "with hope of changing fields." – paul garrett Sep 14 at 21:22
  • Hopefully you have fields that are related or close to your field that you can still get into a post doc. It seems unlikely that there is a field that is totally disconnected and totally isolated from every other field. If not then maybe look at doing some courses and networking with more fruitful areas. – Poidah Sep 15 at 0:20
5

To some extent, it's expected that you're not an expert in the field of the post-doc. One of the points of doing a post-doc in the first place is to broaden your research profile.

The thing you should be worried about is your track record - from the prospective advisor's side, one of the most important questions is whether you're able to effectively finish up a research project. If one finished publication is way beyond in the norm in your field, then you should indeed be worried; if it is the norm you may be fine.

The other aspect is to put up a convincing job letter that will explain why you are the right fit -- you may want to emphasize relevant skills and experiences and explain how they will help in the job you apply for.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.