How can I respond to this reviewer's remark?

closed as too broad by Scientist, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩, Solar Mike, user68958, Richard Erickson Aug 23 at 17:36

Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 14
    Hire an editor in the short term, hire a tutor in the long term. – Luke Sawczak Aug 23 at 14:48
  • Sometimes, reviewer write this because they do not want to read your paper (because it is not interesting for them). Or not. Maybe start by showing your work to a native speaker. – user111955 Aug 23 at 15:05
  • @user111955, I think such an editor would be acting unethically. They should give better advice and suspect that they would. – Buffy Aug 23 at 15:15
  • @LukeSawczak, expand that a bit and you have a good formal answer. – Buffy Aug 23 at 15:16
  • 7
    What was the actual quality of the English in your paper? I assume significantly better than the first version of this question, but how much better? – Patricia Shanahan Aug 23 at 18:44

If this is the only remark of the editor, then he likely didn't even read much more than the abstract. You should and can only apologize and make a new submission later.

I've noticed as a reviewer that even in top journals blatant grammatical mistakes can already appear in the abstract and continue throughout the manuscript. Still, the editor send to reviewers and in general I will make a comment on the quality of the language and give few examples with line number.

But, if the quality obscures the meaning of sentences or induces ambiguities I stop reading the manuscript and vote for rejection, because more than 1-2 major revisions are uncommon/unwanted by reviewers investing their free time and the good journals are more and more in competition for a fast review/pulishing process.

Hiring an editor can be expensive, especially with a draft containing ambiguities etc. More than polishing up your language is not their task and job. In general, for quality control of language and comprehension of your content it is imho necessary to "pre-review" before submission to a journal/editing service, that means to ask someone in e.g. your research group or a colleague to read the draft, who was not engaged in the actual research, but has an educational background in the best case. Your supervisor/professor should normally be able to judge if the quality meets the journal standards. Then there is still the option to hire an editor before submission or stick to use more standard phrases in scientific publishing, which you can find as lists via google or borrow from published articles of the journal you want to submit to.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.