2

I have already finished my PhD at X university. I am now a postdoc at Y university and in collaboration with X university (by "in collaboration with X" I mean that I actually have two supervisors: one from Y and one from X).

Only Y is paying for me, and, I am currently working in the lab at Y university. But my affiliation is X and Y in the scientific papers. My supervisor at Y accepted that I also use the affiliation X.

As I am using two affiliations X and Y in my scientific papers, can I consider that I am a postdoc at two universities at the same time? Is it possible that I write in my CV that I am a postdoc at two universities even that X is not paying for me?

Any help will be very appreciated.

  • 2
    If someone reads your CV and asks you what it means that you are postdoc at two universities, would you tell him exactly like in your question?! Or is this some quantum-superposition-state I don't get ;-) Professors only name normally several institutions if they get paid by both or the institutions are related but structurally independent, but the professors has responsibilities in both. In your case I'm not sure what you are trying to make up. Being supervised by two looks rather like babysitting and not additional responsibility of you to me to turn it into the negative extreme? – user48953094 Aug 18 at 0:28
  • Yes I was wrong. I think I should not say that. – Christina Aug 18 at 9:10
  • I tried to update the question's title to better reflect the situation - the crux here is not whether it's OK to list post-docs at different institutions, but whether you're actually a post-doc at one of them. – lighthouse keeper Aug 18 at 11:14
  • 1
    What do you hope to gain from writing in your CV that you were a postdoc at two places at the same time? – ndpl Aug 18 at 12:47
  • @ndpl If X is a top institution, there's certainly a benefit of having their name associated to oneself. – lighthouse keeper Aug 18 at 13:49
8

You may present yourself as a postdoc at X if, and only if, you have an official appointment at X, the kind that comes with an official title, effective start date (and usually an end date), and is documented in some kind of official document of the institution X - a contract, appointment letter, etc, signed by some official person. Otherwise it is simply not true that you “are a postdoc at X”, so obviously you shouldn’t say that you are.

If you have such an appointment (it sounds like you don’t), it would then be appropriate to list it in your CV. The best practice in that case would be to write your official title rather than “postdoc”, although if you want to clarify that the position is a kind of postdoctoral position, it would be reasonable to add this in square brackets or as a footnote.

Note that some official appointments are unpaid, so whether you are paid or not is not the main point.

Finally, everything I said above also addresses the question of whether it’s appropriate to represent X as an institutional affiliation in your papers (if you don’t have an official appointment, it isn’t; the institution hasn’t given you an appointment, which means they have not endorsed you as someone they are willing to have their name associated with on scientific publications).

  • 4
    Yes, indeed. Just collaborating with more senior people at another university does not make you a post-doc there. – paul garrett Aug 18 at 3:58
  • Yes I see. Thank you a lot for your answer. – Christina Aug 18 at 9:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.