2

Situation: I had a firm interest in field A and applied to relevant schools. I was admitted to Univ. X and Y's program starting from this fall semester. X is more renowned program than Y in my department. There was a professor (potential advisor) in X whose research works and style closely aligned with my own interests.

I enrolled X but rejected soon because I heard some bad instances from some people who worked with the potential advisor which were so critical that some students left his lab. After the rejection, I got another email explaining how those complaints can be misleading and some good sides of the potential advisor. I asked X to withdraw my rejection but soon canceled that query because I was scared of losing both schools when they find that I was doing this. But regretted so much that I asked X for reconsidering my admission again. Finally, professors in X officially declined my query, stating they would welcome my re-application in the next year.

I tried to settle down in Y. However, I couldn't find my interest in the works of the potential advisor in Y. I wanted a balance between quantitative and qualitative works, however, his works seemed to be inclined to the latter. In the field similar to A in Y, professors were either not taking students or out of the US for several years. I could barely find interest in research works done by other fields in Y. Because I want to do what I can passionately do, I decided to re-apply to X.

Questions:

  1. Will my application to X be disadvantageous?

  2. Should I write the reason I rejected and why I want to make a shift in my SOP?

  3. If I participate in a project in Y, should I tell the advisor in Y about my decision? Should I have a reference from him?

Thank you for reading this long explanation.

closed as off-topic by Buffy, corey979, Enthusiastic Engineer, Dmitry Savostyanov, Tommi Brander Jun 7 at 9:14

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – Buffy, corey979, Enthusiastic Engineer, Dmitry Savostyanov, Tommi Brander
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.