The department I work in has been dysfunctional, and there is a history of reversals of decisions where both yes and no votes were overturned by the university level committee. Very recently, a candidate who went up for promotion to full professor had a mediocre record, and the department T&P committee was trying to push her through. It was found out that they intentionally omitted her lowest teaching evaluation, and when confronted by a senior colleague, a member of the committee tried to lie about it to cover it up (the committee member tried to claim that they ‘sometimes’ drop the lowest and highest, but the evidence clearly shows that only the lowest was dropped). What is the likely outcome, if any?

Update: I should provide some context here. Three of the members on the tenure and promotion committee have pretty weak scholarship (less than what would be acceptable for tenure and promotion based on current standards of the department, but are associate professors though have not published in years). One member was an assistant professor who recently received tenure, but her status is still shaky and needs political support to keep moving forward. The candidate in question has a very close personal relationship with the T&P committee members. The department has substantially dropped in rankings from 15 years ago, where it was in the top 10 in US News to now in the mid-40s. There is talk of a merger with another academic program at the university. Of the faculty who were hired and went up for promotion, the ones voted up by the department were all previous graduates of the school, so there is indication that nepotism is in play. At what point will the upper administration say there is too much dysfunction and step in? What might be done?

closed as off-topic by Buffy, Solar Mike, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩, Nicole Hamilton, Brian Borchers Jun 2 at 15:04

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – Buffy, Solar Mike, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩, Nicole Hamilton, Brian Borchers
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 3
    This is too local for a good answer here. – Buffy Jun 2 at 10:43
  • 5
    Send the evidence to the Dean at the highest level - be prepared for consequences... – Solar Mike Jun 2 at 10:52
  • 4
    @CaptainEmacs "be prepared for consequences" What do you think that means? – Solar Mike Jun 2 at 12:18
  • 4
    Errrm. "Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards". – Buffy Jun 2 at 12:30
  • 2
    Get out while you still can. – JeffE Jun 3 at 20:21