I am a high school student and I am trying to publish my first research paper in mathematics.

However, I have already had my full paper posted without author information on the website of another organization. Now this paper (in pdf) can be found by Google. Does this prevent me from publishing the paper in a journal because of plagiarism-check issues?

I can prove that I am the author in the following way: that organization where I posted the paper can provide proof that I uploaded it and that the paper contained no significant plagiarism because it was checked by Turnitin.com's software before upload. The plagiarism-check report and the paper were posted online at the same time. How can I provide a proof like this to a journal? (I have not submitted the paper yet.)

(For lack of experience, I did not know that I should not have done this.)


3 Answers 3


Assuming you didn't actually publish it - you only posted a preprint - then the answer is no, it does not. However you will need to prove that paper is written by you and therefore not plagiarized. Submit the proof together with the paper, or you are likely to receive a desk rejection. You could for example upload the proof as a source file, and add an explanation in the cover letter.

If you did actually publish it then the answer is yes. Journals generally do not republish already-published papers.


There are two complicating factors involved here. It may or may not be possible, but it depends on these issues at least. Even if it is possible, there may be some "risk".

When the "organization" published your paper, did you assign your copyrights to them? It is possible that you did, and also possible that you retained all rights and just gave them a limited license to publish. The outcome is very different for these two situations. What did you sign or implicitly transmit to them to make it possible for them to publish. If they hold copyright or an exclusive license then there are things you cannot do yourself. Copyright law varies widely from place to place but is generally becoming more restrictive.

The second issue is that many places won't publish anything that has already been published. Many of them actually want you to sign over the copyrights and don't want to be limited by some prior license that you gave to another organization. This is very strict with some of them. But it is a limitation imposed only by their now policies and these vary. It would be a mistake to try to publish with such a journal without informing them of the situation.

But even if neither of the above considerations apply, you might have difficult claiming that a work is yours. If the original publisher makes the claim then it will be believed (most likely), but if only you make the claim it might be open to dispute unless you are backed up. In an ideal world (not this world, unfortunately) this would be a simple matter.

Therefore, the place to start is with the original publishing organization. You don't describe its nature. I worry about reputable organizations publishing the work of students anonymously as you have stated unless the is very controversial and you need some form of anonymity for personal protection. But you don't describe the circumstances.

But is that organization that holds the key. If you ask and they say no, without a legal reason, then you proceed with some repetitional risk.

An additional complication is that if you simply reuse what you previously published, without citing it properly, you can still be accused of self plagiarism. Normally one cites and quotes ones earlier work, rather than just reusing it.

By the way, turnitin isn't a sufficient check to prove the absence of plagiarism. Plagiarism is much more complex and subtle than what can be judged by an algorithm.


I don't think journals actually use TurnItIn to check for this, the methods they use may be more or less effective, but if they do find out you published somewhere else, the TurnItIn saying it's not plagiarized won't help your case.

Journals tend to not publish articles published elsewhere. However, their concerns here is being second fiddle to a competing journal. They don't actually care that much about you keeping your research a secret until the moment you submit. You can go to the journal's website and read their publication guidelines and policies to learn exactly what they allow and don't. For example, many journals are okay with research being published in arxiv.org or as a thesis. If in doubt you can always email the journal, say where you published and how much the text changed since then, and if they say no that settles it. I wouldn't try to lie about it, because not only could you get caught while in review, but if you are found out after being published the paper could get retracted, which could look even worse than not being published at all.

The real problem is that it was published anonymously, so from their point of view you might be trying to steal someone else's work. But you say you can get the other organization to confirm your authorship, so it shouldn't be an issue. I would proceed like so:

  1. Submit the paper normally
  2. If the submission form asks whether the paper was published before, link to the article and explain what sort of organization published it and point out important ways in which your manuscript is different from the version published there (if it doesn't ask, you should probably mention it in the "other comments" box)
  3. If they ask about proving that you published the other one, then provide your proof from the other organization

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .