8

Is it possible to have more than one corresponding author for a conference or journal paper?

Useful question about corresponding authors:

4 Answers 4

7

Being corresponding author does not primarily concern the journal publishing process. The role of the corresponding author is to handle communications with other researchers once the paper has been published, to respond to questions concerning the research as a whole, methods, results. It is typically the most involved person who takes on this task and in many cases it is implicitly understood it is the first author. So for you to take on the corresponding author task means much more than the communication during the publishing process.

I can see reasons for there to be more than one corresponding author, although I have never encountered it. This would be if the paper contains material where two (or more) authors are experts on separate parts and it is necessary to contact each for specifics on their specialty. As I said, I have never seen it and am not sure it has ever been done. Perhaps we might find out through comments to the answer...

2
  • You're right. It's no need for me to be correspondent. But I want to know different opinion on multiple corresponding authors. Is it possible? How? and Under what circumstances? I googled it and found no helpful answer so I thought it maybe a good question to have in this site. One less answer in mind. I love that.
    – sajjadG
    Sep 24, 2013 at 14:07
  • I think one of the linked questions came to the conclusion that there is no single definition across all fields, and "Being corresponding author does not primarily concern the journal publishing process" may be true for some fields and false for others. Aug 7, 2015 at 17:44
6

It is possible, and at least in my field (chemical engineering) it is quite common. One example: in this paper there are two authors, and both are corresponding authors! There are even papers with more than two corresponding authors (3 and probably more)

Probably the most typical case is when you have two (or more) teams collaborating. If you have an experimental and a theoretical team, you can imagine that questions/discussion concerning each aspect of their joint paper might be better directed at the respective team’s expert. Same thing if you have a paper including very different techniques/methods, or multidisciplinary paper with teams from different fields.

1
  • The same is true in chemistry. Also note that in chemistry the corresponding author is usually the primary investigator (but rarely the first author, who did most of the experiments). Check out this paper in which I am the first author, and there are two corresponding authors.
    – Ben Norris
    Sep 24, 2013 at 16:43
3

Having two (or more) corresponding authors is also common, if the paper is submitted by a student (or post-doc) who is expected to leave the research group soon and may not be able to attend to correspondence, reviewer queries etc, particularly in case the review gets delayed. In these cases, it is customary for the adviser to add his/her name as the corresponding author

0

It is possible, as far as the journal allows it. In the journal I copy edit, only one corresponding author is allowed. Full stop, no discussion.

Different journals have different policies, some, for instance, do not have the notion of a corresponding author at all, and only mention that "at least one e-mail address shall be provided".

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .