I submitted a manuscript to a journal in the social sciences. The response to the initial submission was "accepted with conditions". The only feedback I received related to a few typos and grammatical errors. I reviewed the entire paper for additional typos, made some minor edits to improve overall flow, and resubmitted the manuscript. Four months later, I received a letter indicating that the manuscript "can be publishable with major revisions". To me, this decision sounds like the manuscript is farther from being accepted for publication than it was after the initial "accepted with conditions". Am I interpreting the journal's decision correctly?

  • 2
    Did you also get reviews back in the second email? If not, I would reach out to the editor for clarification. It seems an incorrect button may have been clicked.
    – Dawn
    Mar 20, 2019 at 15:57
  • I did receive reviews in the second email, and I must say that this time they were much more detailed than what I received after the first submission.
    – Miso
    Mar 20, 2019 at 16:58
  • I think the editor made a mistake by sending out an accepted paper for review. Mar 21, 2019 at 2:05

2 Answers 2


The solution -- as in so many cases in life -- is to communicate. In this case, write to the editor in charge and ask what happened here and how they intend you to proceed. Like @Buffy mentions, it is likely that the second round of the paper went to different reviewers. This is not entirely uncommon, but awkward anyway -- the editor should have looked for substantive reviews the first time around already, rather than just go with the typo fixes. But it happens, among other reasons because a reviewer who promised a review just doesn't get it done, and the editor feels the need to go with what they have -- just to receive the missing review a week later.


It is likely that your paper got sent to a different reviewer (or several) who had different ideas bout the paper. I don't think your changes are to blame here, but I hope you are getting guidance as to the nature of the requested revisions.

I don't think this is entirely uncommon.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .