3

I have one accepted manuscript waiting to be published. During the proof, I changed the corresponding author from me to my postdoc adivsor. Editor now asked why I made such a change.

What happened was that when I submitted my manuscript, I am the corresponding author by default. I failed to find any option to change it. So I planed to change it later on.

What shall I respond in order not to be rejected during this stage?

I am major in the theoretical relativity physics.


Update:

After nearly one week, my request finally is approved. I do not even have to fill out a form.

  • 2
    What publisher is this? (In any case, it does not seem this ought to be a big deal. Just explain to them what you said here, and I don't anticipate problems.) – Andrés E. Caicedo Feb 26 at 1:22
  • 1
    In some disciplines "corresponding author" is just the author with the most permanent address or the person who took care of submitting the paper. In other disciplines there's a convention that the corresponding author is the author who contributed the most to the paper. – Brian Borchers Feb 26 at 1:27
  • @BrianBorchers I am working in the theoreical physics in relativity. – Drake Marquis Feb 26 at 1:30
  • @AndrésE.Caicedo It is springer. – Drake Marquis Feb 26 at 1:31
  • I figured. I doubt you will succeed. I have horror stories involving Springer. – Andrés E. Caicedo Feb 26 at 1:36
11

Just say what you said here: you intended the corresponding author to be one person, but accidentally set it to the other. That's a fairly unexceptional reason to change and I wouldn't expect it to raise any major issues.

5

Give them the honest reason. Modifying the list of authors is suspicious because incidents where authorship was purchased have happened before. You're only changing the corresponding author, but from the editor's point of view, better safe than sorry.

Since you weren't acting unethically, you shouldn't have to fear a rejection, either.

1

I suspect that there is no chance that you will then be rejected. Just say what happened and why. I'm pretty sure the editor want to know why rather than be looking for a reason to reject. If you are at the current stage they already have a lot of effort in your paper that they wouldn't want to waste. They would much rather publish such papers than not.

But you may have caused a minor difficulty in their record keeping.

An outside chance is that they are wondering if they need to improve their system or the information they give people.

Another wild guess is that they want a bit of assurance that all authors are on board with the change and that it isn't a case of closing someone out at the last minute.

  • It's fairly common for editors to ask all coauthors to OK any change in authorship after the initial submission. – Brian Borchers Feb 26 at 1:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.