0

I have a paper (A) that has been submitted to a journal, but is as yet unreviewed, and another paper (B) that cites A. (The citation is necessary because A includes details of the preparation of a dataset that is used in B. The preparation is not central to B, but it is relevant.) I am about to submit B to another journal for review. I think it would be useful to have a preprint of A available (and cited in B) in case the reviewers of B want to see it. Posting a pre-print of A on ArXiv seems to be the ideal solution. BUT, the paper does not fit any of the subject categories on ArXiv. It is in teh area of renewable energy engineering, while ArXiv is largely confined to Physics, Maths, Computer Science.

Should I submit the paper using a subject category that is only incidentally relevant (Physics and Society for instance, or Systems and Control), or is there an alternative pre-print archive with a borader range of categories?

1

The archive engrXiv is dedicated to engineering. Wikipedia has a list of preprint servers where you might find other possibilities, but the engrXiv is the only one dedicated to engineering, as far as I can see.

There are other solutions to publish preprints as well: your institutional repository or generic archives such as figshare or Zenodo. Both accept articles and will provide a DOI.

0

You don't need an Arxive paper. The world got along fine with this sort of issue well before the development of Arxive.

For example:

paper A on apparatus: submitted to J. New Apparat.; emphasis on apparatus design, perhaps a little results but not main emphasis.

paper B on chemical: submitted to J. Wierd Chem.; emphasis on chemical info, cites previous work as "submitted".

[Or many other reasons for paper A and B having some relation, benefiting from citing each other, but also from separation. For instance if they are separate chemical findings but in a similar area by same researchers.]

As long as the findings are non controversial, you should be fine. If there is a question of controversy, accuracy (e.g. if you are claiming some really novel method that people many doubt) than sure they may want to see a preprint or even insist on combining the papers. But you can deal with that by just sending a copy of your submission to Journal A. And I wouldn't even do it pre-emptively. Just when/if challenged.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.