1

This question already has an answer here:

I submitted a a short note, less than 10 page long, to a very prestious journal in mathematics. It has been about 4 months and I have not heard back. I wonder if that means the note made it pass through the initial assessment and is under review or it simply doesn't mean anything. The status of paper reads: reviewing. How does the reviewing process differ from lower tier journals to much more selective and reputable( whatever that means)journals?

marked as duplicate by Thomas, Solar Mike, cag51, user3209815, corey979 Jan 28 at 8:29

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 10 pages is not short. – ZeroTheHero Jan 28 at 1:18
  • 2
    @ZeroTheHero It's short in mathematics. – Elizabeth Henning Jan 28 at 2:03
  • For a 'very prestigious' journal expect the referees to use a fine-toothed comb, hence take even longer than usual. – David Roberts Jan 29 at 6:12
3

The biggest difference between top level journals and others is the care taken in the reviewing process. Four months doesn't sound especially long.

Perhaps the journal publishes definitions of its terms such as "reviewing" which might give you an idea. But likely, it is being looked at by other mathematicians with knowledge and interest in your area. If the paper is straightforward it might get reviewed quickly, but be rejected for lack of impact. If it is not straightforward it will take longer to asses.

It is also possible that delays can occur if a reviewer decides after an initial look that he/she can't give the editor proper advice and passes it back with another reviewer then needing to be found. This could occur for many reasons, not all related to the paper itself. Some of the time delay is also likely due to the normal end/beginning of year academic scheduling with holidays occurring in most places.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.