A recent SE Academia question asked about how best to implement a university's requirement that the instructor must keep attendance records for all students. The top-voted answer there was to simply refuse to follow the university's policy, specifically, "Allow all students in class and do not monitor attendance." The justification and comments indicate that this is such an unusual and egregious demand at a university that it should be refused on its face.

Coincidentally, around the same time this topic independently came up at my own institution (large college in northeast U.S.), where mandatory attendance records, recorded by instructors and collected by the college, have been the process for many years, since before I arrived.

When this discussion came up in my department I cited the SE question linked above and its top-voted answer. However, it seems that almost all of my colleagues (~40 faculty members) simply disbelieved what I was saying. Their sense was that mandatory attendance-record-keeping was standard and customary at any academic institution in their experience. At least one comment was made asserting that other institutions forgoing attendance records would be a sign of lowering academic standards.

So: What is an evidence-based estimate for the proportion of U.S. college classes that have a mandatory attendance-record-keeping policy? A proper answer for this would require some kind of reference for the evidence of the estimate. The estimate could be at the level of the university, college, division, department, course, or something else, depending on available data. Additional points if a historical profile can be given, i.e., confirmation on whether attendance requirements have been growing more or less common in recent decades.

  • 3
    "mandatory attendance-record-keeping was standard and customary at any academic institution": Around the world: not in the slightest. Dec 24, 2018 at 20:11
  • 1
    @MassimoOrtolano you missed the bit about "in their experience" which could well be limited in terms of variety of institutions...
    – Solar Mike
    Dec 24, 2018 at 20:28
  • 1
    I don't know of any formal data about this, but I think this would be very interesting to do a study on it.
    – JoshuaZ
    Dec 24, 2018 at 21:05
  • 1
    @MassimoOrtolano: Is there an evidence-based reference for that? It might make for part of a useful answer, actually. Dec 28, 2018 at 2:39
  • Unfortunately, I don't have a reference for that. Dec 28, 2018 at 6:18

2 Answers 2


In the US there are actually some federal rules governing attendance keeping. Colleges must account somehow for students receiving federal aid, for example. That is a lot of students, as it likely includes those with government backed loans. While the rule doesn't seem to require that instructors keep a formal log, they are required to know who is attending and who is not.

For example, Here is a sample page from a large US state university: https://uc.uiowa.edu/faculty/teaching-instructional-policies/student-attendance-absences.

Some states will, themselves, impose additional rules, as will some individual privately funded colleges and universities.

There are a variety of reasons for such rules, including liability. If a student "disappears", especially one who is not technically an adult, the powers that be will want to know.

Beyond such rules, some instructors count attendance in the grading rubric, but I don't think that is especially common post-secondary. But non-attendance can be a symptom of other problems and so instructors are expected in general to know who is there and who is not - especially when missing class or other activities is repeated frequently.

So, while I don't know what percentage of colleges require this, my guess is that it is fairly high, based on the need to keep records. But it is also my guess that the rules aren't strictly honored in a lot of places.

  • 2
    Not that the U Iowa document you linked to include either attendance or participation in academic activities. This is pretty common also where instead of directly taking attendance one has enough assignments, quizzes, etc. that one can get decent estimates from that if someone is involved.
    – JoshuaZ
    Dec 24, 2018 at 21:14
  • 6
    Although this requirement exists throughout the US, I don't think most institutions comply by requiring faculty to keep attendance records. At least, in my last 19 years of attending and teaching at US colleges and universities, at no time were faculty expected to take attendance regularly. Dec 25, 2018 at 0:36
  • 3
    At my current institution, the only requirement is that when a student is given a grade of F, we must report the last date on which they participated in the class. Assignment records and the professor's best effort to remember seem to generally suffice. Dec 25, 2018 at 0:38
  • @NateEldredge My current institution and the last two I've been at have also done it that way.
    – JoshuaZ
    Dec 28, 2018 at 15:33
  • 1
    The ABA has strict requirements regarding attendance so tracking attendance is almost universally mandatory in accredited law schools. Dec 29, 2018 at 0:08

The US military academies (granted they are "uncolleges") have mandatory attendance. Even regular schools often have mandatory attendance for sports or labs for safety reasons and to verify everyone does the work for the grade. I have seen some teachers in just regular classes at regular schools who also have mandatory attendance. It is unusual but not illegal or immoral.

I guess you could also consider other examples of schools with required attendances (job courses, high school, etc.). Again, you might not like it or think it is 19th century behavior. But it's not completely unknown for.

  • I'm unable to accept this as answer because no estimated proportion of classes with mandatory attendance is given, and neither are there any references. May 9, 2019 at 16:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .