I believe the Nobel prize benefits some scientists, but is bad for science as a whole, because it is too political. (My belief is aligned with Taoism.) Am I mistaken: Does the Nobel prize benefit science?

closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas, scaaahu, Buzz, Solar Mike, henning Dec 19 '18 at 6:58

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 5
    That's... primarily opinion-based. – Clement C. Dec 19 '18 at 5:21
  • A less opinion-based question would be: Why are awards so important in academia? Or even: Do awards help to advance research? – henning Dec 19 '18 at 6:58
  • Would you please explain why Nobel prize has anything to do with Taoism? – scaaahu Dec 19 '18 at 7:02
  1. There's also the news aspect. Some people would say that it helps science/tists overall in the publicity. Or even for the general public gives them some education benefit/awareness of key advances.

  2. You could also make the argument that science and society benefits from people attempting to get the Nobel. If that is a motivating factor for some scientists to work harder. (I.e. there is a big benefit to society from good work even from all the people who miss it, fairly or unfairly.) I doubt it. Figure paycheck is higher driver. But just listing the idea. I'm sure that when Nobel created the fund, he saw this as a rationale for doing it. (Like Millenium prizes.)

P.s. I wouldn't get too wound up about who they select or the politics of it. That's not Taoist either. Or...not Zen anyways. Or not Stoic. I don't really know philosophy, but don't let it bug ya. There's WAY closer to home unfairnesses to get aggravated about in academia and science. ;-)

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.