I did my M.Sc. recently and we have agreed to publish it in a journal with my supervisors. I have got once comments from the first supervisor but it is almost two months I couldn't got the final comments. I have followed up it and the supervisor mentioned he would give comments shortly. I am worry he may want to refuse from contributing, and he couldn't mention it, directly. He may have any convincing reason for him self for refusing from authorship but I am pretty sure the quality is good enough and it can be published in a journal.

How can I politely ask his decision?

Should those papers that are derived from thesis include supervisors name?

  • How can I politely ask his decision? — I suggest "What is your decision?" – JeffE Aug 20 '13 at 2:04

Authorship: Strictly speaking authorships should be determined by the academic intellectiual contribution. It is rare that a thesis topic is solely invented by a student on their own so it is most likely that an advisor regardless of input during, say, writing stages will be an obvious co-author (if that is how authorships are determined in the specific field). There may of course be more co-authors and the order is not necessarily clear due to differences in traditions and cultures.

Response: Not getting response is unfortunately quite common and very unfortunate. I think you have to keep asking for a response but also add that you are interested in submitting the paper soon. If you are through with your education, you might be moving and it seems reasonable to get a paper in before leaving for other work/equivalent. So the answer is to simply politely ask and maybe massage your advisors ego by saying how much you would appreciate/need his/her comments to complete the joint paper. Just keep your cool and avoid nagging. At some point you will simnply have to provide a firm deadline due to whatever circumstances may exist. If you have some other faculty to whom you can confide then asking for advice may be a good point as well.

  • If I ask someone from other university to give comments I have to add his name in the paper, subsequently. Shall I inform my co-authors before asking comments or help from someone else in my case? – Topdombili Aug 19 '13 at 12:44
  • 3
    I don't think you need to add someone as a co-author unless that person's comments significantly added to the content of the paper. For example, if someone simply helped polish the language or provided other editorial feedback, I wouldn't consider that a "significant technical contribution". In such cases it would be enough to mention their contributions in an Acknowledgements section at the end of the paper. – debray Aug 19 '13 at 12:54
  • 3
    Providing feedback to a manuscript is not generally enough to warrant co-authorship. The contribution should be more significant and affect the conclusions in such a case. – Peter Jansson Aug 19 '13 at 13:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.