How valid is to refer to previous literature reviews in other papers to 'create' a thorough review?

The thing is that I am working in a new methodology, which I will compare with the current state-of-the-art (published in 2017). In there, the authors have done some literature review, which is not thorough. Hence, I want to focus only on the work that they didnt cover. In addition, there is older work what has been reviewed by others. Putting my literature review contribution, together with the paper from 2017, and together with the two oldest papers, then we have a 'thorough' review. Is this a valid approach?

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I would suggest that you include the work you have read, as well as the works that the other papers mention. The purpose of the literature review in a paper is to describe related pieces of work, and showcase how your work complements, surpasses and stands out. This strengthens the narrative of your research and helps the reader understand what makes your paper valuable, compared to other approaches. In order to achieve that and build a more complete image, you need to include as many related papers as you can find and study in the literature review part.

  • I am also including some of the work that others have covered, but only if I have a different opinion or angle compared to what others have said. However, there is couple of papers that have covered older methods in such a deep and clear way that I cannot find a new insight into those methods. Hence, I feel like it is better to point the reader to that work. – user1571823 Sep 15 at 8:56

If the issue you are referring to is important, then it really is worth tracking down the original work to see what was really communicated, as opposed to what some review author offered. I would not consider anything less to be thorough.

Too many times, the message gets garbled in the process. If you misinterpret the original work based upon a flawed interpretation of the review author, that's on you.

One possible exception is if you require a costly translation.

Your Answer

 

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.