I am working on writing my PhD thesis after four long years of work. I'm writing the hypothesis sections, and I am finding it extremely hard to write one single hypothesis that is comprehensive and specific enough without using vague wording. Can I have three hypotheses for my thesis?

For background: my work is in medical informatics, and my thesis work can be divided into three steps:

  1. I evaluated existing models in the literature against our hospital's dataset using a novel approach and demonstrated that their performance is not great;
  2. I developed my own model, which is better;
  3. I implemented it in the hospital, with decent results.

Can I have those three as hypotheses? [1) existing models perform worse than X; 2) a model that is X% better can be built using machine learning; and 3) implementing a model in the hospital can lead to XYZ]? Or do I have to find just one overarching hypothesis and make those three the goals?

  • 1) Consult with your advisor. 2) That looks like one project, and projects just naturally are done in steps. So you designed a model, that turned out to be better than other, and successfully implemented it in a real-life situation.
    – user68958
    Sep 3 '18 at 20:18
  • That sounds pretty typical in my fields, which is at least medical adjacent Sep 3 '18 at 22:03
  • Sidenote: “a model that is X% better can be built using machine learning” – I would remove “X%” here. You certainly didn’t have any numbers in mind when you started working on this.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Sep 4 '18 at 6:48

This is the sort of thing that you should discuss with your advisor if you have questions. This may be field specific; that said, I'd be surprised if there was any sort of specific limit on the number of hypotheses discussed in a thesis.


You can certainly do that, but if you can get your degree with a simpler structure it might be worth doing one thing and use the other work for future papers and such. Your advisor should be a good guide here, actually.

It doesn't sound like you have three distinct things going on, however, and that all three of them support a common overall theme. If the results all point the same way you should have a strong result. Your number (2) seems like the big thing, with (3) supporting it and making it concrete, though I don't see how you support (2) without (3). Not my field, though. But (1) would be a pretty common element of a dissertation.

That sort of thing is pretty common actually in many fields.

I would only recommend against a number of hypotheses if they were disparate in some way.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.