3

I have recently developed an interest in a hot topic of computer science and I would like to pursue a master's degree in that topic. Looking at the available grad school programs and their admissions process they all (very understandably) require recommendation letters.

The issue is that I graduated 6 years ago and not expecting to ever need a recommendation letter for further academic development I have not kept any connections with previous professors. I could try to contact some of them who I had a good relationship with back then, but I believe the most I would get now is either a rejection or a run of the mill "This student was punctual and had good grades" type of letter.

In the past 6 years I have served in the army for a year and worked in the industry for the next 5. I believe I have a good chance of getting a good recommendation letter from past and current managers.

My question is this. Do I absolutely need recommendation letters from professors in order to get a place at a grad school program or is anybody who I have worked under a good reference? How do admissions committees look upon recommendation letters by non academics?

I am not looking for a career in academia. I want to apply the knowledge I will get in the industry. (And I intend to put this in my motivation letter)

If it makes any difference I am interested in European universities

2
  • 2
    Most universities will state if they require academic letters of recommendation or not. Often times for industry-oriented programs, some or all of your letters can come from coworkers, bosses, clients, etc. In the US, I think it’s common to require one academic and the rest can be from anywhere. If you can’t find this information online, you should call the admissions offices at schools you are targeting and ask. Jul 25, 2018 at 12:12
  • 1
    Do you know of anyone in industry who has the type of degree you're pursuing? While it probably wouldn't be quite as helpful as a letter from a professor, someone who went through a similar program would be able to speak to how well they think you would do in a similar environment. Jul 25, 2018 at 15:45

2 Answers 2

4

This is the sort of question that can only be answered correctly by an individual university. Some will interpret such rules very strictly, others not so much. You can, of course, inquire directly with either the admissions office or an individual academic department, giving your situation. The feedback you get should guide you and help you avoid some of the frustration.

However, as you do that, you can also try to re-establish the relationships you once had, in person if possible. You may be surprised and some of the people may remember you and wish to help. This reestablishment of old relationships is a good thing in any case and people may be able to guide you further.

The comment of user Stella Biderman about industry letters is also correct and will help in most cases.

Another avenue that might be open to you, however, is to actually approach a faculty member at one of the universities you would like to attend. You can most likely learn their office hours from an administration office. Show up, perhaps having first sent a letter stating that you will, and talk about what you would like to do. If you can interest them in you, they might be able to ease your way.

Faculty members are busy of course, so make any such meeting at their convenience and be ready to state your goals and make your case succinctly. Again, you are likely to get further advice, rather than a brush-off.

In general, I think that unusual situations don't fare well unless unusual measures are taken. If you just meld into the crowd you won't get any "special" consideration.

There are likely a lot of others in similar situations. Find a way to stand out a bit from the crowd.

2
  • +1: I was in a rush earlier, but had I written a full answer it would have been approximately this. I especially like the point about contacting faculty at the target university. One potential downside to this is that you’d have to do it separately at each university you apply to, which might be prohibitively time consuming or not plausible if you don’t have physical access to the universities you wish to attend. Jul 25, 2018 at 13:30
  • I can endorse @Buffy's advice from personal experience having sought to embark on a PhD program over 40 years after my last academic work and in a field quite unrelated to my work experience. The key thing was to interest my intended supervisor in my proposed research, and only then discuss how to meet the formal requirement for a reference.
    – JeremyC
    Jul 25, 2018 at 23:32
1

Compared to PhD programs, applying to a masters program is usually low stake, so that works in your favor. If you're applying to department that offers a PhD in the same area, the masters students in the program are basically low-effort piggy banks. In my experience, most masters programs do not offer funding and have a limited number of TA-ships. They want your money, so all you really have to do is show them that you have the basic qualifications to get in.

If you're worried, the best thing to do is take a class in your preferred area through a prestigious program - online or in person. Most universities offer extension courses that you can sign up for and pay for on a per unit basis. Then ask the instructor for the class to write a letter that says you are currently capable of conducting the sort of academic work required for a graduate program. That's all your readers really need to know. FYI - this is how I got into my PhD program. I took a one-off graduate course in my area at the program I was applying to and asked the prof to write a letter for me.

You can also do something similar by participating in a boot camp or certificate program. These could all add to your credibility in CS. Also, you might bypass the masters entirely by doing this (hint, hint).

Your undergraduate degree is stale, so you can only rely on your recent experiences for non-academic letter. Assuming they ask for a personal statement, you can explain why you need non-academic letters - these are the people who are familiar with your current skills. No need to say anything else about it. I'm not sure whether your current work involves any sort of programming or relevant computer work, but it would be ideal if your writers could write something about this in concrete ways. If not (or if so) - do you demonstrate a capacity for algorithmic thinking and problem solving (e.g. how are you at decomposition?)? How are you at procedural tasks? Basically - figure out what the basic skills of a CS masters student are and have them describe how you satisfy some of those condition, even if you're not spending your time programming.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .