It's known that high quality survey papers will direct the community attention towards the author(s). Knowing that, I faced with an important questions on writing such articles. Can such papers be considered as counter-measures for the authors? Specifically, for a graduated student who want to apply for a PhD program, having several survey and literature review papers is a good sign of being a professional researcher in the field (of interest) or it won't be considered a major prominence for him.

I think such a situation can be regarded as a distinguishing criteria for a pre-PhD student because he could conduct such deep study in a specific field.

Am I right?

  • 3
    I'm not sure that I agree that survey/review papers direct attention to the authors - good survey/review papers direct attention to the field. Further, I'm interpreting 'papers' here as journal articles, and it would be unlikely for a pre-PhD student to have several published review articles. – Jon Custer Jul 10 '18 at 15:19
  • @JonCuster, Why it's unlikely? – Eilia Jul 10 '18 at 15:48
  • 1
    Because, typically, journals will either request a review paper on a specific topic from somebody well known in the field, or somebody well known in the field will propose a review paper to the journal and the journal will accept the proposal. Technical journals generally aren't going to accept a review paper from some 'random' person, and are highly unlikely to accept a review from somebody who has not published in the field. – Jon Custer Jul 10 '18 at 15:58
  • @JonCuster, I heard such criteria for survey papers previously and some of the highly-esteemed journals in CS follow this way. However, in the domain, one can witness many quality review papers by 'random' persons who are newcomers in the field. As I know, in CS, the quality of papers are most important than quality of authors. Anyway, thanks for your comment! – Eilia Jul 10 '18 at 16:02
  • To help answer your question, have you published any articles in a respected conference or journal in your field? (Computer science is unusual in that many conferences are more highly regarded than many journals; in most other fields that I know of, journals are always more highly regarded.) I'm asking this question because, as a pre-PhD student, I'm not sure how aware you are of the difficulty involved in publishing in a highly respected publication outlet. Also, are you talking of publishing alone or together with an experienced researcher? – Tripartio Jul 10 '18 at 20:02

It would depend, of course, on your aims and purposes. Academia generally rewards specialization over generalization. Doctoral Research, in particular takes you deep into the weeds of a normally quite narrow topic.

Survey papers, on the other hand, are evidence of generalization, though within a single field, usually. They demonstrate breadth, not depth. (See note at end)

Educators (as opposed to researchers) on the other hand value breadth, quite a lot. Most academic positions combine teaching and research, of course.

If you are wanting to apply to a PhD program, or for a research position, I think your deep and narrow papers will serve you well. If you are wanting to apply for a teaching (primarily) position, then breadth will be an asset.

In industry, on the other hand, the evaluations will be quite different. If you are hired to solve a particular problem, then the evaluation will be biased, at least a bit, on how quickly you can be productive (i.e. narrow and deep). But for a management position at the same firm, a wider and more comprehensive view is usually valued.

My advice to students is to study a lot of things broadly and a few things deeply. This seems (to me) to be a good balance.

I think, however, you are asking the question as a person who wants to enter a doctoral program. Unless you already find one tailored to your narrow interest, you will be well served if you are seen as someone who can relatively quickly move into a variety of research areas. It gives you a better choice of advisors than if you have already narrowed your interest.

Note that I interpret "survey" to mean a fairly wide net. It is also possible to "survey" a very narrow spectrum. In some sense the list of references in a dissertation form a survey of a narrow field. If that narrow view is what you actually intend, my answer might be quite different.

  • (+1) Thanks for your thorough answer. I think I find out what I'm looking for:) – Eilia Jul 10 '18 at 15:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.