I'm an undergraduate in CSE doing research this summer under the guidance of a professor. After an initial repeating of a previous experiment, I've been reading relevant research papers for three weeks. The program ends on August 3rd, so I have less than a month left. The professor hasn't said anything to me these past three weeks, and I don't really know what to do since this is my first time. He is rather busy.

On Friday (3 days ago), I emailed him some general ideas of a research direction (very informal, I don't think it was really a research topic proposal), and he responded: "Your ideas make lots of sense. Just go ahead". Is this an "ok"? I feel like he's upset (because of the word "just"), but I might be overthinking. Sorry kind of a stupid question, but this means I am free to continue (and that) he's not upset?

Thank you

  • 13
    The answer of JPDias seems right on the money. I wouldn't read anything into "just". Just do it. ;-)
    – Buffy
    Jul 9 '18 at 18:08
  • 20
  • 1
    You are probably overthinking it. I would send the same response if the topic/idea is sufficient to teach you research, if that is the intention. Also, he/she might think of your project as 'low priority' given other commitments; e.g., I'm required to supervise undergraduate students which I cannot pick and choose. Most of the time nothing useful comes out of these projects. So I tend not to place too much time on them. This means any topic that is 'reasonable' and not too hard for an undergraduate is 'ok'. Jul 10 '18 at 2:47
  • Related-almost-duplicate: Why do academics frequently write very short email replies? Jul 10 '18 at 7:21
  • Which discipline? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSE
    – Qsigma
    Jul 10 '18 at 9:15

So, short answer, that's a yes. However, I think that he wants you to start exploring those ideas and get back to him with more content beyond of what you extract from those papers. Some proof-of-concept or similar.

  • 1
    I had mentioned a method+details with an objective and purpose based on many different papers I read. But I didn't specify algorithms or anything (like which classifier we would use). It should be ok for me to update him weekly(?) right? I will email a more formal outline next time. Thank you for the reply :)
    – chy00
    Jul 9 '18 at 18:09
  • 11
    Don't just outline, actually do implement something and report your progress: what you implemented, what were the difficulties, what you learned, and what results you have so far. Jul 9 '18 at 21:56
  • 1
    @chy00, that depends very much on the professor, her workload, and how much advance you are able to show each time. Personally I'd expect to see you (sort of a "I'm still alive" greeting) say each fortnight, perhaps sit down occasionally for a half hour or so to see how it is going or if you hit a snag or need to request extra resources.
    – vonbrand
    Jul 11 '18 at 12:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.