I submitted my paper for publication in a very good computer science conference. When I got feedback for rebuttal:
I had one review that said my work wasn't relavant to computer networking in any way, and that they couldn't understand some abbreviations in the abstract like RIPE.
Then I had another who said that my work is very useful to the research community and even asked for a copy of the library I wrote.
Last, I had a reviewer that just told me to make my images larger and to include a better literature review.
I tried to rebut as best as I could, especially against the first review, but knowing that this is a high profile conference, what are my chances of being accepted? It really didn't seem like the first reviwer understood much of my work.