Almost immediately after becoming a corresponding author, my academic email account quickly become inundated with unsolicited communications from predatory open access journals and “conferences.” My spam filter does a fairly good job, catching maybe 50-75% of these messages. But now that I will be using a new academic email address, I’ve thought about what I can do to prevent this problem from recurring. My idea is to publish the following text in the corresponding author field:

Email: [email protected] (remove digit “9” for correct email address)

Will journal editors let me do this? To my surprise, I’ve never seen another author try something similar. I’m confident that no one has (or will ever have) the “fake” email address indicated above, so there is no risk that the spam will go to an innocent third party.

Previous questions on Stack Exchange relate to email forwarding; none addresses the spam issue.

  • 2
    I doubt you can do that in a published article!
    – The Guy
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 2:54
  • 9
    Anecdote: I'm corresponding author on a few dozen articles published over the last 15 years, and I find that (with a good spam filter) the volume of such messages is not problematic at all. They're a tiny fraction of all the email I receive. Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 5:39
  • I mostly see repeated offenders, which can be filtered i.e. by subject or sender real name field. Of course you will need new rules from time to time, but probably you're meaning like at most 1 message per day and not like 100 and a lot of work to sort the inbox. So setting up rules until (almost) nothing gets into the inbox anymore is often possible.
    – allo
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 8:12
  • 1
    How about asking the editor if they are fine with "myname [at] university.edu"?
    – user68958
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 9:04
  • 2
    I have not been a corresponding author yet, still, I get the same spam. Conference participation, posters that can be found online... an academic email address seems to spread like wildfire in general. Filtering it out sounds like the only reasonable option.
    – skymningen
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 10:31

5 Answers 5


We all deal with this curse. Sad as it is, I suspect that your only option is to endure it -- my take is that papers ask you to provide an email address of record in some sort of official way, and playing games like the one you suggest would look inappropriate in this context.

  • 1
    In that case, would it be appropriate to try something like “myname[DeleteThisBit]@university.edu” or “myname @ university.edu”? I’m sure that there are ways to prevent email harvesting that would be acceptable in a formal publishing environment.
    – Maroon
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 3:23
  • 15
    @Maroon In what way do you think that prevents harvesting? If people make a habit of doing that it's a trivial matter to account for it in a script. Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 6:28
  • 4
    @Maroon: That's precisely the point. I've seen lots of my colleagues write the email addresses as name (at) institution.edu on their websites. You can bet that no harvester has even been annoyed by this, but lots of colleagues who want to send emails have. Commented Apr 12, 2018 at 6:15

I sometimes read these spams, for the purpose of finding key phrases/words that can be used to filter them out (not delete, in case they are legit), I've noticed the following wording/phrasing:

  • Dr [your entire name] or reversed your first + last name, or your initials followed by your full name
  • "Greetings of the Day!" or "Greetings and Good Day!"
  • followed by "Hope you are doing well"

so far it's working okay for me, it's not fool proof, but it helps cut down clutter a bit.

  • 4
    to add a few: "Dr Colleague", "Dear Researcher", "Dear Colleague", "Dr httporcidorg" (my personal favourite), "M Mark" (initial + Firstname)
    – Mark
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 8:32
  • 2
    I swear, if I ever get some downtime I'm sorely tempted to write something I can forward emails like these to and have it sign them all up for each other's conferences. Fight fire with fire, and all that.
    – Ed Daniel
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 10:06
  • 1
    @EdDaniel It's hard to imagine that being a productive use of your time. They can much more easily dump their email address and start again than you can dump your university address. Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 12:27
  • @DavidRicherby, but it's fun and probably a good release for Ed Daniel to imagine doing it. :) Commented Jul 3, 2021 at 19:54

If your email server supports this version of email aliasing, you could set up:

[email protected]

Alternately, if you have your own domain name, you could host your own email:

[email protected]

These are legitimate email addresses for correspondence, and so the journal should not object on that front. You would just know to expect a lot of spam there.

  • 10
    This might prevent a lot of spam from reaching your primary inbox, but it also makes it much more difficult to sort out any real emails you would receive at that address.
    – David K
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 13:19
  • @DavidK Set up an autoreply: "Dear writer, it appears you've tried to reach me through an email alias set up to catch automated email. In case you are in fact a human trying to reach me, please re-send the email to me, removing the +alias from the email address. For example [email protected] would become [email protected]."
    – orlp
    Commented Mar 29, 2022 at 10:02

If this is really important to you, I think the only reasonable thing to do is to contact the journal's managing editor and suggest that they implement such obfuscation across the board. Journals tend to pay a lot of attention to publishing all their papers in a consistent format, and I don't think they will want to allow obfuscation for your paper alone. I suppose you could ask, but I don't think such a request would be well received.

  • 3
    Any obfuscation applied consistently across the board would be relatively easy for the spammers to script around, while increasing cognitive burden for humans.
    – WBT
    Commented Apr 11, 2018 at 18:44

The emails I get tend to bypass my Bayesian filters by including the full title of our paper and sometimes our abstract in their email text (and I don't want to train-spam on this in case I get legitimate mail about it), but most of them so far have started with Dear Brown, S.S. or even Dear Brown, S.S.,Chen, Y.W,Wang, M.,Clipson, A.,Ochoa, E.,Du, M.Q.. Our paper was in fact published with the full versions of our names (in both PDF and HTML); I'm not sure which third-party data sources abbreviate the names in this way while also giving abstracts and emails, but it has so far been a useful 'red flag' for the filters (at least to file in the spam folder to be checked infrequently). I have to be lenient to the possibility of being written to by a human who really does not know how English names work, but I can combine that rule with one that looks out for American Journal of (very commonly used as part of predatory journal names) or peer-reviewed international journal (it seems they can't resist saying this), and includes the word unsubscribe (obviously I wouldn't trust a spam 'unsubscribe' link to work, but the fact that it's there is a hint): I can say in my ImapFix configuration that if it matches these criteria it goes into the spam. No false positives so far. (your unpublished is also a common phrase)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .