I am a prospective PhD math student. This year's application season has brought me down to two schools to choose from:

  1. Medium-sized department, ranked <80 on US News (whatever that means), very welcoming people, potential advisor is very young but seemed like we would "click", surrounding area and city is beautiful, program looks awesome.

  2. Larger department, top 20 program, potential advisor is famous in his field, current advisor says I would work well with him/he's a cool guy, don't know much else since I've not visited.

I am waitlisted at university 2. University 1's initial offer to me included the standard stipend along with a decent fellowship. I made a visit to university 1 and talked with many professors and my potential advisor. After this visit, they offered me a ~17% increase in my stipend due to some professors advocating for me who were apparently impressed (whom I do not know other than my visit). I feel that this is a good sign, but I am ultimately pursuing a career in academia. So I know prestige plays a big roll in future jobs. Assuming I have an offer from university 2 as well:


  1. Is this late stipend increase offer typical?

  2. Based on your experience and insight in the job market for academics, which university is the better option?

Thanks for your time to read.

  • 4
    the better option is 2, but there you are only waitlisted, so you don't really have a choice at the moment.
    – Bernie
    Apr 4, 2018 at 1:46
  • Prestige plays much less of a role than whether you do good research in your PhD. However, of course, prestigious departments are prestigious because people there tend to do good work.
    – xLeitix
    Apr 14, 2018 at 19:15

2 Answers 2

  1. It's not too unusual. Lower-ranked schools know they need to work a little harder to attract top talent. For example, I did an REU at a lower-ranked school, and they admitted that the only reason they bothered offering an REU program was hoping that some of us would become grad students -- they normally couldn't attract grad students of our caliber. Offering a 15% stipend increase to particularly promising students seems altogether appropriate.

  2. University 2. I might seriously consider university 1 if you didn't like university 2 for some reason -- what you do is far more important than where you go, and getting into a top school does not guarantee you an academic future (not even close!!). But in your case, both seem like good options, so if you get into university 2, I would go there.


There’s nothing wrong with a school revising its offer. In fact, I’d view the improved offer as a sign of serious interest—schools aren’t likely to do this for all of the students who visit. So this means that they want you to join their department, which is a plus in my book. (The big reputation is great, but a school that values you for you also matters instead of being merely a cog in the machine!)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .