3

I would like to know what license needs to be chosen in arXiv for a paper that is to be sent to an IEEE journal, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (TPDS).

Arxiv licenses:

  1. non-exclusive and irrevocable license to distribute the article.
  2. Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY 4.0).
  3. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-SA 4.0).
  4. Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
  5. Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (CC0 1.0).

I read numerous pages like A, B, and C, but I didn't find my answer.

  • Arxiv has a minimal license option. If any of them work, that's the one. – Thomas Apr 3 '18 at 14:55
1

I am no lawyer and I have not read the complete legalese, but as far as I see, the first option (non-exclusive and irrevocable license to distribute the article) is the only possible valid one, as it is the most restrictive.

All the Creative Commons licenses would allow others to distribute a copy of your paper (with attribution and some possible restrictions, such as the non-commercial clause). However the IEEE policy allows only the following:

  • Author’s personal website
  • Author’s employer’s website
  • arXiv.org
  • Funder’s repository

[...] The posted article must be removed from any other third-party servers.

So using a CC license would result in a conflict, as you cannot both allow others to distribute copies while at the same time guaranteeing to the IEEE that there will be no copies on other servers.

This does not guarantee that the first option is the right one, however since the IEEE explicitly allows arXiv.org and we have excluded all the others, they will probably not complain...

  • Is the first option the most restrictive or the least restrictive? – scaaahu Apr 6 '18 at 5:19
  • I would call it the most restrictive, as the author gives away the least amount rights to others. – mlk Apr 6 '18 at 7:55
  • This might be relevant after the OP has signed away their rights. – einpoklum Nov 29 '18 at 8:54
0

Prevent IEEE access restrictions - Don't use option 1

The IEEE's ability to legally restrict access is based on having exclusive rights, which they take from you by strong-arming you into signing those away.

The solution is to actually grant the relevant rights beforehand to someone else - without losing them yourself - so that when you sign the IEEE copyright form, there will be someone else to give you the rights back afterwards. That's why you should choose one of the last three options, never the first one.

Recommendation: CC-BY-SA

Personally, I would tend not to restrict commercial use from the get-go. It's tempting, but when you think about it - the social damage from having to go through you for economic use of your findings is probably higher than the benefit of sticking it to the large corporations or what-not.

As for public domain - I'd be against it, since attribution is important not just to you but also for academic/scientific work. So, wanna use my paper? Citation please.

Non-SA licenses: I would be worried about derivative work being non-free.

To be honest, though, this isn't a strong recommendation and all three are fine by me I guess.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.