3

Can I use acronyms and abbreviations in the conclusion of a scientific paper or should I avoid them?

Even though the main idea of acronyms and abbreviations is to avoid repetition, my impression is that acronyms should be avoided as a conclusion should be somehow self explanatory.

Is there a consensus on something like that?

  • I'm voting to close this question as it is more suitable for Writing.SE – padawan Mar 20 '18 at 16:05
  • 3
    @padawan I don't agree. It's about scientific writing, which often is different than writing in general. It's on topic here. – user68958 Mar 20 '18 at 16:57
2

The abstract should be self-contained, so any abbreviations used therein should be explained at first occurence (if a term occurs only once, then there is no need to introduce an abbreviation), and citations should be given in its full form (i.e., [Name, Journal, Volume, Pages, Year]). Then starting from the Introduction, one introduces abbreviations at their first occurence again, even if they were introduced already in the abstract.

And while I somewhat understand the desire to keep the Conclusions self-contained, too, at times when I wanted to do so either the reviewer or the language editor insisted that there should be only abbreviations once they are introduced. Personally, I don't like starting a sentence from an acronym, or a number, but the editors don't have such dillemas; so I usually just write so that there are none at the beginning of a sentence.

I once argued about it with the reviewer, but the language editor then again said to stick to abbreviations. I guess there are more chances to get it one's way in case of a very long paper (>50, or even >100 pages) for the sake of clarity.

  • So, basically you agree with me but the feedback you often get is that it's not acceptable :-) Well... who's right and who's wrong then? – Learn_and_Share Mar 20 '18 at 22:57
  • @MedNait It's more a matter of writing style. I see your point, but don't agree 100% - I also appreciate the brevity that the editors seek. – user68958 Mar 21 '18 at 0:09
  • After a second thought, using abbreviations in the conclusion section of a few-pages paper don't seem necessary. And as you hinted to, their use might be justified in case of a long paper/book. – Learn_and_Share Mar 22 '18 at 20:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.