5

I am submitting an article on a conference that follows a double-blind review system. However, the following is mentioned on its dual submission policy:

Papers that have appeared on non-peered reviewed websites (like arXiv) or that have been presented at workshops (i.e., venues that do not have a publication proceedings) do not violate the policy.

So, if the above is true, I might as well have submitted a paper that has also appeared in arXiv, where the identities of the authors are visible. Wouldn't that effectively constitute a violation of the double-blind review policy?

10

Wouldn't that effectively constitute a violation of the double-blind review policy?

Clearly not, as they state that it doesn't violate the policy.

Does it break double-blinding? Yes. But the intent is clearly to allow those who submit preprints, are in fields where conference proceedings are a thing, etc. to still be able to submit. It's essentially a compromise position of "Double Blind where possible, but we're not going to kick you out if you've broken it through the standard course of research."

  • 5
    +1 There are plenty of other ways to break double-blinding too - perhaps your lab is the only one working on a particular application of a topic; perhaps the reviewers have seen you present an earlier stage of this work at a colloquium; perhaps the field site or type of samples you use will give you away. 100% double blind is often impossible, but we make do. – rturnbull Mar 9 '18 at 0:50
  • 3
    I'd also expect the reviewers to avoid deliberately breaking blinding by looking up who wrote the paper on arXiv, unless they have a reason that specifically involves authorship (e.g. suspected salami-slicing or plagiarism)... – nengel Mar 9 '18 at 7:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.