Can my advisor's advisor (he is a very well known person in the field) be a reviewer for a paper written by me along with my advisor (I mean the authors are me and my advisor). The work is extending/generalizing a work of my advisor's advisor. I mean whether conflict of interest will allow this. Thanks in advance. Any help/suggestions will be useful.


Conflicts of interest have to be determined individually for each author of each work product (paper, proposal, book, etc.). If a person has a conflict for any author, she should not act as a reviewer.

In the case you cite, your advisor’s advisor cannot act as a reviewer for your advisor, and thus cannot serve as a reviewer. If your advisor is not a coauthor, then your advisor’s advisor could act as a reviewer, but I would likely err on the side of caution and not nominate him as a reviewer.


Have a look at the submission instructions, you may also link them here. It depends on the conference/journal/publisher/... how they define a conflict of interest. Most likely, this will not work out and is a typical case of CoI if they have collaborated very little time ago.

  • 1
    Thanks. Yes, they frequently collaborate. Also, suppose if I write single author paper in the future can he be reviewer ? – RIchard Williams Feb 27 '18 at 12:18
  • It depends. This should be OK in many cases, however, have a look at the submission instructions. – J-Kun Feb 27 '18 at 12:45
  • 2
    @RIchardWilliams From what I see, usually recent co-authors and advisor/student are considered in conflict. On the other hand, you and your advisor's advisor are not automatically in conflict. – Alexey B. Feb 27 '18 at 17:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.