I'm working on my CV right now. I have been teaching EFL at a university for 2 years. It has been my first university position. I am planning on applying at universities back in the States soon. I am educationally-qualified (meaning, I have the degrees required), however I do not have much experience (6 years teaching, only 2 university). I wanted to list as much information as possible, so I have been writing about each course I have taught (about 6 different courses). I have included course name, objective, textbook, and course highlights (meaning unique projects that would set my courses apart). I am wondering if this is necessary or useful?

  • EFL = English as a Foreign Language? Is that the term being used instead of ESL now? – Huck Bennett Jun 2 '13 at 16:54
  • 1
    @HuckBennett EFL is used for people learning English in a non-English-speaking country. ESL is used for people learning English in an English-speaking country. – earthling Jun 2 '13 at 23:10
  • @HuckBennett ESL=English as a Second Language. The way I understand it is that EFL and ESL have been mixed usage. See this Wiki page – scaaahu Jun 3 '13 at 2:58

A brief description of the courses you've taught is never remiss, as it helps reviewers place your teaching work into context. This is especially important for teaching-primary positions. However, for many positions, you also have the ability (or requirement) to submit a "teaching statement." This would be a place, for instance, where you could discuss your unique projects.

What I would certainly want people to know about in the courses I taught:

  • Full course name
  • Whether they were required or elective
  • The intended audience (e.g., "freshmen" or "upper-year undergraduates and graduates in the major")
  • How long (how many times) you taught the course
  • Did you have sole responsibility, or was it co-taught
  • Format of the class (lecture, seminar, laboratory, etc.)
  • A brief description of the course, if its nature cannot be inferred from the title (for example, "Introduction to US History to 1865" doesn't need an explanation; "The Critical Period" would.)

Other information could be listed on a "courses taught" appendix, but I might not necessarily include it directly in the CV.

  • Do you think it would be better to list the courses and their descriptions right under the university position, or as an appendix? – Acornrevolution Jun 3 '13 at 22:36
  • Personally, I list them under a separate section of my CV. Basically, the more courses you have, the more important it is to separate it out (in the interests of clarity, organization, and readability.) – aeismail Jun 3 '13 at 22:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.