Previously I submitted my paper in MS Word format to arXiv. Now after almost two years, I decided to submit an updated version in LaTeX format.

To create the LaTeX version of the document, I downloaded a template from here that added a line at the top of each page saying:

Under review as a conference paper at ICLR 2016

Do I have to remove that notice, or is it OK to leave it as is?

  • 4
    (Off-topic: The balance upvote for the answer / upvote for the question is really surprising.... How could an answer be so good if the question is so terrible? I don't get it.)
    – Clément
    Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 3:02
  • 1
    Was your paper ever even remotely related to that conference?
    – pipe
    Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 9:11
  • (@Clément As much as it's not "proper" I imagine it's a lot of "you shouldn't need to ask this, I doubt it will help anybody in future", and then "but since you did - this is definitively the correct thing do to")
    – Bilkokuya
    Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 13:55
  • @pipe: I guess it was.
    – Hossein
    Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 18:05

1 Answer 1


Remove it. It is not appropriate to mislead people as to the submission or publication status of your paper. You should also remove any other reference to the conference appearing in the paper (e.g. a logo).

Additionally, you'll have to upload your LaTeX source to arXiv in order to have it posted, including the conference style file, so you should make sure its copyright allows this.

(Even if you really had submitted the paper to that conference, you typically wouldn't acknowledge this in the preprint. The reason is simple: if the paper isn't actually published in that conference, people will be able to infer that it must have been rejected, and this is something you'd probably rather were not publicly known.)

Update: Here is a question from someone who used a template that included the name of Journal X when submitting to Journal Y, and had the paper rejected on suspicion of double submission. While I think that Journal Y was out of line in doing this, it does illustrate that these sort of misunderstandings can have serious consequences.

  • 2
    I'm glad I asked this before doing anything. by the way, to make things more clear for myself and possibly other newbies as well, does under review mean that the paper is accepted ? the reason I'm asking is that initially I thought , anyone can submit to any conference, and get reviewed, and then get rejected or accepted. so if a paper is under review, it doesn't mean anything. Is my assumption correct ?
    – Hossein
    Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 16:24
  • 14
    @Breeze Nope, under review means just that: It's under review. It doesnt mean nothing. Still, you can't pretend it is, if it's not.
    – JS Lavertu
    Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 16:33
  • 4
    @Breeze: Another possible source of trouble is if the paper had been accepted in another conference before 2016, or if you actually submitted it to a different conference at the same time. Then people would suspect you of double submission which is considered highly unethical, and this could lead to a lot of problems for you. Commented Feb 13, 2018 at 16:41
  • 3
    @Breeze There are a lot of simple LaTeX templates out there. Some of them, like the one you found are made for specific conferences or journals or so on; others are general-purpose. So you just need to find a good general one. TeX - LaTeX (perhaps in the chat room) would be a reasonable place to ask for help with that.
    – David Z
    Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 9:29
  • 3
    Generally speaking, academia places a high value on honesty. You know it's not true and therefore you shouldn't say it. Whether or not it gives any "merit" is irrelevant. Just don't lie. Commented Feb 14, 2018 at 18:30

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .