Although the presence of a senate suggests that universities nominally are governed somewhat by their faculty, it is frequently stated that there has been a trend towards greater managerialism, which has perhaps undermined the powers of faculty regarding university governance.

What current powers does a faculty senate typically have, or is it mostly a rubber-stamp for the administrators?


This question seems a bit wide to answer. Are you interested in public or private schools? Junior college or peer 1 research level? US or elsewhere? Let me answer from the prospective of a 4-year US state institution. Generally senates seem to be what the faculty make of them, they can choose to become a rubber stamp, or choose to act...

A. The senate functions as a voice of the faculty

By filtering and focusing the concerns of the faculty, the senate functions as a key voice of the faculty. A voice selected or elected by departments across the campus. The senate can conduct dialog with the administration, offer press releases, lobby with legislators, join in with other institutions to tackle larger issues... Whether or not they are listened to, faculty member should speak together often about the central issues at the institution.

B. Determination of General Educational Policy

Traditionally the senate allows the different disciplines to discuss joint concerns, such as the general education policy, starting new programs, ... They are rarely the final voice (or even the key voice) in these issues, but they are an important one. Anytime an educational goal has been set, it is the faculty who should determine the curriculum, these decisions usually pass through a senate body.

C. Maintaining the Faculty "handbook"

This may be given different names at different institutions, but the subset of policies and procedures related to tenure, promotion, post tenure review, usually fall under faculty review. Core parts are usually decided by the institutions board, but many of the details of faculty evaluations, ... are often decided by the faculty. Even when they are not, the Senate provides a united voice to address these issues.

D. Protect the Faculty's Interests

For example, the Senate should (to the best of their ability) be involved in suggestion priorities for budgeting (whether listened to or not); in suggesting standards for academic freedom (and explaining to its member what it is, and what it is not); when necessary, the Senate should be ready to stand up for individual faculty when the institutions polices have been incorrectly applied; ...


I've been on the Senate and on the Faculty Board of Studies in my university. Basically, boards like these are about communication, to make sure there is some oversight by academics of administrative decisions. They do have veto rights, and on rare occasion these may be exercised. Individuals on them have an opportunity to bring things to the attention of academic executives. How happy they seem about an idea also gives the executive an idea of how much trouble an idea will be to implement. They also learn things about what is happening in the university or faculty which they can bring back to their department.

How useful a board is and how much communication is really done depends on both established culture and individual initiative. But the mechanisms are usually there in the university's charter for these groups to actually to be quite useful.

  • 1
    I am (happily) surprised to hear that at some universities faculty senates have veto rights. In my university, apart from tenure decisions (which still must be approved by the Provost!), the faculty senate is purely_advisory. – paul garrett Mar 28 '14 at 19:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.