1

I had submitted a copy of a reading-cum-review project to arXiv in my undergrad sophomore year without really thinking of the consequences. The paper was announced and eventually moved to the General Physics section.

The issue with the paper is that it does not contain any new research and the review is far from being exhaustive. Besides, it was typed in a very unprofessional manner with too few references for a review paper.

Now that I am a grad student and need to associate a real journal paper to my arXiv account, I was wondering if having such a paper on arXiv hurts reputation in the long run. Is it usual to have casual reports uploaded on arXiv, or is it advisable to withdraw it and start afresh?

  • 5
    You can update the file, so the problems with the typing at least could be fixed. At the same time, add a note saying it is an undergrad project. – Jessica B Jan 18 '18 at 7:08
  • @JessicaB Thanks! Is there any reason why you would recommend not withdrawing it? – Arole Jan 18 '18 at 10:18
  • 1
    You cannot completely remove it, as mentioned below. Withdrawing it suggests it's actively wrong, rather than simply not as good as it should be. – Jessica B Jan 18 '18 at 12:28
4

Unfortunately after article announcement you cannot remove full record from arxiv. Further information can be found here.

  • If I understand correctly, withdrawing the paper would remove it from search results on arXiv. I guess that would be enough for me. Is there any obvious way to access the paper after withdrawal? – Arole Jan 18 '18 at 10:19
  • 1
    @Arole, withdrawing the paper does not remove it from search results. If you use the advanced search for "Comments" field containing "Withdrawn" then you will get plenty of papers, and you can verify that you can find them e.g. by searching for their title or author. – Peter Taylor Jan 18 '18 at 11:07
  • 1
    @PeterTaylor, thanks for demonstrating what "Withdraw" actually means. So the only use of withdrawing a paper that I can think of is to acknowledge a major error in the paper. I guess this makes withdrawing the paper quite meaningless in my case. – Arole Jan 18 '18 at 12:26
1

You're actually asking several sub-questions:

  1. Can I withdraw the paper?
  2. Should a paper containing no research be un-published/withdrawn (regardless of venue)?
  3. What should I do with this specific paper

1. Papers can't quite be removed from ArXiv

You cannot completely remove a paper from ArXiv once it's been published there. The ArXiv withdrawal policy says:

Articles that have been announced and made public cannot be completely removed. However, you may submit a withdrawal notification for your article.

You can definitely submit such a notice if you decide you want to withdraw; here's an example of a withdrawn paper - where you see the withdrawal notification. But, again, the paper is still accessible, forever.

The example is taken from this answer by @ff524

2. "No new research" does not make a paper unworthy of publication

Many papers offer a different view of existing research findings; or consolidate, compare, contrast or compile other pre-existing results, hopefully making them more accessible to the reader.

Your other reasons for withdrawal seem more pertinent.

3. What should you do?

For the you mentioned, you could make a withdrawal notice; however - don't be too harsh on yourself in phrasing it. Mention that this was an undergraduate research project and that, in hindsight, it isn't sufficiently exhaustive.

But rather than a complete withdrawal, you could just change the description on the paper's web page on ArXiv, indicating the same thing, as a sort of caveat.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.