I have been accepted into a PhD program in the US for Mechanical Engineering, but the graduate school did not give me funding for the first year. Being an international student, I do not have opportunity of funding through government fellowships, etc. So, I am planning to contact professors for opportunities in their groups.

What should I mention in the email? I am trying to understand proper way to approach professors for funding after admit. Also, what other funding sources you will suggest?

  • 2
    You should ask if you can be a TA, otherwise be ready to prepare a bank statement saying that you have $40,000 in your bank account to pay for your first year. Why would a PhD program admit someone without funding? Jan 13, 2018 at 15:24
  • What field are you in? Expectations and practices differ radically between, e.g., computer science and theatre.
    – jakebeal
    Jan 21, 2018 at 13:10

1 Answer 1


First note that what has happened to you is a failure on the part of the academic community to ensure appropriate employment conditions for junior researchers. A PhD candidate is a junior researcher - someone who will do research work, albeit of a limited scope, and with initial meandering, and with some supervision - who should be paid.

This perception will also guide you regarding what to do about funding. If you ask Professors for a handout - because you're a nice guy with high grades - you'll probably not get it. You will essentially be asking to be "posted" in their group as an employee, in which case they will (hopefully) be inclined to pay you a salary already.

For every lab you're considering:

  1. Check, if you can do so easily and outright, whether the lab has paid/funded open positions. If you know that it doesn't - it's not relevant. (That is, since you didn't say you know what you want to do research-wise; otherwise most of my advice is irrelevant.)
  2. Make sure the research work there actually interests you. Otherwise you'll sort of be scamming them for your salary - which is quite legitimate considering the situation the university has put you in, but is psychologically difficult for all concerned. This means, in particular,
  3. Go visit the lab, physically. Try to arrange meetings with grad students and/or postdocs in the lab, to hear about what they're working on. This is common practice for new grad students and usually encouraged. During that visit (and not just then),
  4. Try to figure out how your experience can be relevant to what they're doing - or to something they're not doing, but would contribute to their research objectives. It can be either in advancing their research proper, or in building things, or using some software you're proficient in, or writing code, or using materials or processes you've had experience in etc.
  5. Now write your email, asking to meet with the PI to apply for the open position. Or, if you can schedule such a meeting directly when visiting the lab, based on some 'hook' of a suggestion from somebody there - that's even better. Base your pitch on your experience and conclusions from the previous phases.

Note these phases may not happen in this order, or in any order (i.e. these may overlap). Also, you probably want to parallelize this for different labs rather than go one-by-one.

  • I think this answer better describes the European experience than the American. Here doctoral students are often (usually?) students, not employees. It is quite different in Europe.
    – Buffy
    Dec 2, 2018 at 23:23
  • 1
    @Buffy: PhD candidates are effectively employees, even if they don't have that official recognition. The lack of recognition, again, is due to the collective weakness of the academic staff. However, this is gradually changing. A historical ruling marking this shift is 364 NLRB 90, Trustees of the University of Columbia vs UAW.
    – einpoklum
    Dec 3, 2018 at 7:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .