5

I'm getting ready to apply for a graduate program in biophysics at a few different universities. I'd just like to ask a question regarding the quantity and quality of letters of recommendations.

I'll first give some background about my current application. I have a 3.0 cumulative GPA (there is a valid reason for a few low grades early on in my career which I won't get into here, but my GPA has increased dramatically since then), my physics GRE score is a little low and my general is above the 55th percentile in all three fields.

I have two strong letters of recommendation. One from the director of my lab, and one from the head of experimental physics at my university. My question is regarding a third letter. Most applications state that 3 letters are required. I have two options for the third letter at this point; the first being from my advisor, who I've never taken a class with but knows me well, and the other is from a professor who said he'd write me one but it wouldn't be very strong as he can only discuss my character and, to quote him, "general interest in science".

I'm afraid that a third letter would hurt my application, regardless if two of the letters are strong. How damaging would two letters be in applying to a physics graduate program?

Thank you.

closed as off-topic by Stella Biderman, scaaahu, Coder, Wrzlprmft, Florian D'Souza Dec 15 '17 at 17:00

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – scaaahu, Coder, Wrzlprmft, Florian D'Souza
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • What do you mean by "advisor"? Is this a mentor for a research program? Or an appointed academic advisor? – AJK Dec 15 '17 at 4:13
  • Sorry, I should have been more clear. An appointed academic advisor. – Kosta Dec 15 '17 at 4:15
  • 1
    I haven't sat on a grad admissions committee, but for many other applications, the story is that there are tons of applicants, and people look for reasons to not study an application carefully. Not including the required number of letters would be an example of an easy excuse to ignore an application. – AJK Dec 15 '17 at 4:17
  • 2
    When someone says they can only discuss your character and strong interest in science, that sounds like it's not going to be a great letter. If your advisor can write you what he says is a strong letter (and possibly give some context to your GPA), that might be valuable even if he hasn't had you in a class. – AJK Dec 15 '17 at 4:20
  • I voted to close this as “primarily opinion based” because I misclicked. I meant to close this as “off-topic: seeking personal advice” – Stella Biderman Dec 15 '17 at 4:32
3

If the application calls for three letters of recommendation and you only submit two, your application may be considered incomplete and may not be considered at all.

So if you don't have a third letter, you're going to have a problem. But if the third letter is weak, it will hurt your application, too, which means you're stuck between a rock and a hard place.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.