0

This question already has an answer here:

I submitted a paper to a top journal last week. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". What does this mean? Does this mean that the AE changed his/her mind and recommended to desk reject my paper and put forth his/her recommendation to the editor?

marked as duplicate by user9646, padawan, Fomite, Enthusiastic Engineer, Buzz Mar 17 '18 at 19:52

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3

Sometimes tracking systems do not work very well and a change of status could mean nothing. Since I am a pessimist person I would give the same interpretation as you, but it is impossible to know. The wait is frightening but in this case is all what we have. Good luck!

  • Indeed -- it is impossible to know. The online systems map only poorly onto the workflows of editors. You cannot draw any inferences based on what they report. Have patience. – Wolfgang Bangerth Dec 6 '17 at 18:23
0

Usually, the handling editor (or whatever name they have in the journal’s system) handles a paper in one go, which typically includes:

  • They decide whether the paper is actually a good fit for the journal or they want to desk-reject the paper.
  • They decide whether anything needs to be done before sending the paper to peer review.
  • They select the peer reviewers.

Now, an editorial management has to somehow summarise that you are waiting for this step. A good compromise between precision and conciseness would arguably awaiting potential reviewer selection or awaiting editorial assessment, but there are also journals who call this just awaiting reviewer selection.

Thus the interpretation that suggests itself would be that the handling editor did find out something that has to be decided upon first. If you hadn’t already passed a step called awaiting AE recommendation, the handling editor recommending desk rejection would indeed be my best guess. Apart from that it could be something trivial like you botching a figure or the list of citations.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.