Timeline for Is Science Publishing group (http://www.sciencepg.net) a genuine publisher related to the Science journal? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2020 at 14:01 | history | closed |
Anonymous Physicist ZeroTheHero Jon Custer Senex Richard Erickson |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 27, 2020 at 12:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 29, 2020 at 14:01 | |||||
| Dec 25, 2020 at 22:32 | history | edited | GoodDeeds | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved previous edit's link text for better flow
|
| S Dec 25, 2020 at 22:30 | history | suggested | Tsundoku | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
meaningful link text instead of bare URLs.
|
| Dec 25, 2020 at 21:12 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 25, 2020 at 22:30 | |||||
| Jun 26, 2019 at 6:08 | vote | accept | Trina | ||
| Sep 1, 2017 at 9:10 | comment | added | David Richerby | Why are people voting to close this? Whether or not "Science Publishing Group" is the publisher of the magazine "Science" is a simple matter of fact. | |
| Aug 31, 2017 at 9:26 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 1, 2017 at 9:10 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2017 at 1:24 | history | edited | Googlebot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Aug 1, 2017 at 22:30 | history | edited | Ellen Spertus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed typo in title
|
| Aug 1, 2017 at 21:19 | answer | added | Googlebot | timeline score: 3 | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 21:09 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | @Stephan Sturm: I have to agree. Your example beats mine hands down: The study of DNA in relation to Cosmos, and in turn to Vedic Astrology, may open new doors in understanding the planets’ role in bringing about a particular event in life. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 19:31 | comment | added | Stephan Sturm | Still better than the their newest publication in statistics and actuarial science, article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/… | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 15:34 | comment | added | Dave L Renfro | I'm not particularly impressed by this paper, which I found by looking through the titles of one of the mathematics journals. The editing is poor -- even a basic electronic spell check would have caught some misspellings. The results are not very deep -- most any beginning graduate student could come up with the proofs. No motivation is given for why one would be interested in this particular metric space generalization and the generalization they study is not compared with any other generalized metric space notion. | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 13:23 | comment | added | Pablo | Looks like it's a predatory publisher, see this list: beallslist.weebly.com | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 12:12 | comment | added | Dirk | Science Publishing != Science Publications would be my first guess... It doesn't look like one of the sites is trying to copy the other one, they have different journals, etc. So I'd guess that this is just an ordinary publisher, spamming people to get reviewers/editors, which happens rather regularly. As I'm just guessing from the websites and I don't know either publisher, I will leave this as a comment rather than an answer... | |
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 1, 2017 at 13:49 | |||||
| Aug 1, 2017 at 11:53 | history | asked | Trina | CC BY-SA 3.0 |