Timeline for Factors contributing to Research apart from publishing Technical Papers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 27, 2013 at 23:14 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 28, 2013 at 1:42 | |||||
Mar 25, 2013 at 1:49 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/316003856653901825 | ||
Mar 23, 2013 at 17:39 | answer | added | Espanta | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 23, 2013 at 15:34 | comment | added | user6392 | @JeffE Thanks a lot! I have done some stuff related to what you have mentioned in that answer. I hope that pleases the admission authorities. | |
Mar 23, 2013 at 15:30 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
Mar 22, 2013 at 18:51 | comment | added | JeffE | See my answer to a related question. | |
Mar 22, 2013 at 13:26 | answer | added | eykanal | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 22, 2013 at 11:45 | comment | added | Ben Norris | Research potential can be demonstrated in other ways besides publishing. Generally, undergraduate research experiences should be addressed in your application materials, especially your letters of recommendation. They may even appear on your transcript. | |
Mar 22, 2013 at 11:43 | comment | added | Ben Norris | Check out the answers to this question: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5638/… | |
Mar 22, 2013 at 9:39 | comment | added | Nobody | Peer-reviewed published papers are acknowledged research results. If you can find a way to present your research results, I think it would be accepted by admission authorites. | |
Mar 22, 2013 at 9:15 | history | asked | user6392 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |