Return to Answer

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this (this is from a recent paper, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.01.008):

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

The cited work is

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

With that paragraph I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in Stodden et al. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this:

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

That specific paragraph can be found in this published paper

Marwick, B., et al. 2017. Movement of lithics by trampling: An experiment in the Madjedbebe sediments, northern Australia. Journal of Archaeological Science 79:73-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.01.008 preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/7a6h6/

And minor variants of that paragraph can be found in most of my recent papers. By including this kind of paragraph in my publications, I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in this paper, which echoes ideas found in many other similar manifesto-like papers on reproducibility:

Stodden, Victoria, et al. 2016 Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods. Science 354(6317):1240 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240

The Marwick 2016 citation in the paragraph above is my in-depth discussion of computational reproducibility for archaeology:

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9, preprint: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/q4v73

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this (this is from a recent paper):

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

The cited work is

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

With that paragraph I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in Stodden et al. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this (this is from a recent paper, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.01.008):

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

The cited work is

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

With that paragraph I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in Stodden et al. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this (this is from a recent paper):

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

The cited work is

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

With that paragraph I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in Stodden et al. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240

I typically have a subsection at the end of my methods section that is like this (this is from a recent paper):

Reproducibility and open source materials

To enable re-use of our materials and improve reproducibility and transparency according to the principles outlined in Marwick (2016), we include the entire R code used for all the analysis and visualizations contained in this paper in our SOM at http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RTZTH. Also in this version-controlled compendium are the raw data for all the tests reported here, as well as additional regression diagnostics and power tests. All of the figures, tables and statistical test results presented here can be independently reproduced with the code and data in this repository. In our SOM our code is released under the MIT licence, our data as CC-0, and our figures as CC-BY, to enable maximum re-use (for more details, see Marwick 2016).

The cited work is

Marwick, B. (2016). Computational reproducibility in archaeological research: Basic principles and a case study of their implementation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, doi: 10.1007/s10816-015-9272-9

With that paragraph I am trying to fulfill the recommendations in Stodden et al. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6317/1240