Timeline for Reviewing Manuscript Which Misinterprets My Own Work
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2017 at 23:48 | comment | added | O. R. Mapper | "might be an advisor or close collaborator of the author of the paper that was mis-cited" - or maybe not, given that it's not at all far-fetched for a random reviewer to follow at least a few citations ans read those, if only out of mere personal i terest in the topic. | |
| Mar 11, 2017 at 1:06 | vote | accept | Sam Zipper | ||
| Mar 11, 2017 at 0:26 | history | answered | aparente001 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |