Timeline for How do some researchers consistently get published in venues with low acceptance rates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2017 at 4:29 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/836795499122409472 | ||
| Feb 28, 2017 at 18:30 | comment | added | rhombidodecahedron | I suggest reading about the NIPS experiment. Many papers are random toss-ups as you suggest; some are clear rejection; and some are clear accept. It may be incredibly unpopular to suggest that not everyone can be this way, but the very best of the best researchers will more consistently land their papers in the "clear accept" bin. | |
| Feb 28, 2017 at 3:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 28, 2017 at 13:41 | |||||
| S Feb 26, 2017 at 2:39 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Feb 26, 2017 at 2:39 | comment | added | eykanal | Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. | |
| S Feb 23, 2017 at 12:22 | history | suggested | willeM_ Van Onsem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
making cs/ee more clear
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 11:43 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 23, 2017 at 12:22 | |||||
| Feb 23, 2017 at 8:43 | history | edited | Wrzlprmft♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 23, 2017 at 5:29 | answer | added | orezvani | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 23, 2017 at 1:18 | answer | added | sean | timeline score: 20 | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 23:57 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 23, 2017 at 8:28 | |||||
| Feb 22, 2017 at 23:14 | answer | added | David Ketcheson | timeline score: 37 | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 23:11 | history | edited | David Ketcheson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Feb 22, 2017 at 23:03 | answer | added | HEITZ | timeline score: 54 | |
| Feb 22, 2017 at 22:25 | history | asked | Prof. Santa Claus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |