Timeline for Can I make an exam question for graduate & undergraduate students to find an idea in making a breakthrough in my research?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 19, 2016 at 11:44 | comment | added | cfr | I think it depends a great deal on the details. In general, I'd say (2) is not. If it is really supervision, as opposed to actually doing some of the writing etc. (1) is a different matter and will depend on a lot of further factors, including whether the idea is an original one or not. | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 10:21 | comment | added | gerrit | @cfr Two parts: (1) asking/formulating the right question (a.k.a. the research idea), and (2) supervision in writing things up for publication. Both are, in my opinion, sufficiently significant contributions to warrant co-authorship. See also my comment on CaptainEmacs answer. | |
| Dec 19, 2016 at 4:03 | comment | added | cfr | Why would this merit the asker getting co-authorship? I realise this is common in some disciplines, but it doesn't make the practice any more ethical. | |
| Dec 18, 2016 at 18:34 | comment | added | gerrit | Why the downvote? | |
| Dec 18, 2016 at 0:09 | comment | added | user18072 | That's the only example I've personally ever heard. | |
| Dec 17, 2016 at 21:42 | history | edited | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 17, 2016 at 18:51 | vote | accept | Widi Widiyanto | ||
| Dec 16, 2016 at 19:24 | history | edited | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 16, 2016 at 17:19 | history | edited | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 75 characters in body
|
| Dec 16, 2016 at 12:35 | history | answered | gerrit | CC BY-SA 3.0 |