Timeline for How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2015 at 22:19 | history | edited | henning no longer feeds AI | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added tag, removed clutter.
|
| Jul 12, 2015 at 22:08 | vote | accept | YungHummmma | ||
| Jul 11, 2015 at 19:35 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/619953130621562880 | ||
| Jul 10, 2015 at 17:01 | answer | added | henning no longer feeds AI | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 15:26 | comment | added | Calchas | Aside from the usual pleasantries ("we found the reviewers' comments very helpful and thank them for their time") usually your letter will address each individual comment made by each reviewer for the purpose of satisfying the editor you heeded the advice (or had reasons not to do so). I suppose if it were a very short list of simple corrections it would be sufficient and practical to say you executed them all. | |
| Jul 10, 2015 at 15:20 | history | asked | YungHummmma | CC BY-SA 3.0 |