4 Additional information about Funding
source | link

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has its own ombudsman committee (also with its own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things seriously and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints of misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Also, if the work in question was related to some DFG funded project (to my experience a vast majority of research groups at German universities receive at least some funding from the DFG) and the investigators come to the conclusion that there was a serious misconduct, then the consequence could be that the funding for this is cancelled or reduced. Therefore the Ombudsman committee has some lever to make people act, since just sitting it out might put the financial situation of the people involved at risk.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has its own ombudsman committee (also with its own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things seriously and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints of misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has its own ombudsman committee (also with its own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things seriously and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints of misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Also, if the work in question was related to some DFG funded project (to my experience a vast majority of research groups at German universities receive at least some funding from the DFG) and the investigators come to the conclusion that there was a serious misconduct, then the consequence could be that the funding for this is cancelled or reduced. Therefore the Ombudsman committee has some lever to make people act, since just sitting it out might put the financial situation of the people involved at risk.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

3 Minor improvements to wording
source | link

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has anits own ombudsman gremiumcommittee (also with anits own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things seriousseriously and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints forof misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should havehave a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has an own ombudsman gremium (also with an own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things serious and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints for misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has its own ombudsman committee (also with its own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things seriously and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints of misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

2 spelling
source | link

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has an own ombudsman gremium (also with an own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take some effortsthings serious and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints for misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion, that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has an own ombudsman gremium (also with an own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take some efforts and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints for misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim the committee comes to the conclusion, that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

The brushing off you describe looks like you just raised your concerns to the wrong persons in the depths of the administrative system.

The German Research Foundation DFG has an own ombudsman gremium (also with an own website, however unfortunately only available in German) to investigate academic misconduct.

As stated here

The Research Ombudsman [...] is an independent committee that provides assistance to all researchers in questions involving good scientific practice and scientific misconduct. The Research Ombudsman can be contacted directly, irrelevant of any connection to the DFG.

The contact to this committee is kept confidential throughout the process. From what I have heard in some presentations they really take things serious and don't easily reject cases if there are serious hints for misconduct.

Although the site of the ombudsman of the DFG itself is only available in German, they have an english contact form where also the procedure is described that will be exercised in case of a notice:

If, after an evaluation of the documents that the inquirer provided to support their claim, the committee comes to the conclusion that there might be at least a case of infringement of the rules of good practice, they will ask the accused party for a statement. If it turns out that it wasn't just a minor infringement but some serious misconduct, they will transfer the case to a special investigation committee for further investigation.

Above that every German university should have a local ombudsperson with basically the same function but it may be somewhat complicated for someone external to find out who that is, so I would stick to the one of the DFG and give it a try.

1
source | link