Timeline for More co-authored than solo papers in the Humanities
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2015 at 12:05 | vote | accept | Zoe | ||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 17:10 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/565920869592346625 | ||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 17:03 | answer | added | StrongBad | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 17:02 | history | edited | Stephan Kolassa |
added new humanities tag
|
|
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:55 | comment | added | Davidmh | Do the articles specify the author's contributions? If so, it would be clear what you did, and how your unique skills are a good asset for whomever wants to hire you. (But I am not in humanities, so I don't know if they will be seen like that by most people). | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:54 | comment | added | Zoe | Thank you for your comment. The three papers have only one other author each; these are three different people and none is my advisor. So hopefully that is not problematic! | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:48 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | I am not in the humanities (rather, in math where solo papers are still the norm), but in my opinion it is not the percentage of coauthored papers that could be problematic but rather whether all of your papers are coauthored, and (worse) coauthored with the same senior people. If you have one strong solo publication, then at least in my neck of the woods that would allay people's worries. | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:36 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:39 | |||||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:35 | history | asked | Zoe | CC BY-SA 3.0 |