Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 12, 2017 at 2:10 answer added cag51 timeline score: 2
Dec 6, 2014 at 20:29 comment added mbork BTW, I highly recommend a search-based (as opposed to folder-based) email client. I've been using such a tool for a few months now and I like it a lot. (If I really want to see emails grouped by folder, I can do it - but normally I just enter a search query, involving content, date, flags etc., and my client runs the search across folders and even across my three accounts.)
Dec 6, 2014 at 20:27 comment added mbork ...or do not value their own time. And then, they have no right to complain that someone else wastes their time, too.
Dec 6, 2014 at 20:26 comment added mbork OTOH, while I have to agree that I was wrong: neither everybody uses threads, nor are they always the best choice, my main point seems to hold. I receive more than 60 emails every day; if I optimize my workflow so that I save one second per email, and if I assume that I will somehow have to change my configuration once every year, and even if I spend as much as two hours just configuring my email, I gain net four hours. (And these assumptions are rather conservative.) IOW: if people for whom email is an important part of their workflow do not optimize it, they are either irrational or...
Dec 6, 2014 at 20:20 comment added mbork @O.R.Mapper: well, mixing /Sent/ and /Inbox/ emails is one of the advantages of using threaded view for me;-). What's more, in my email client toggling the threading behavior is the question of hitting one key (P in this case).
Dec 6, 2014 at 20:16 comment added O. R. Mapper @mbork: I don't. I find that confusing. I need to see my e-mails sorted by date, and possibly filtered, not jumbled in seemingly arbitrary ways because some e-mail client thinks it knows which messages belong together. Occasionally, I have to use a web-based version of Outlook that does that by default. It just doesn't work there, and it gets incredibly difficult to find anything - and it is particularly bad because it mixes up e-mails from different folders, such as Inbox and Sent. (But with that said, changing the subject line seems fine to me.)
Dec 4, 2014 at 21:41 vote accept Constantin
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:12 comment added mbork @Erbureth: fair enough. OTOH, does there anyone not use an email client displaying threads? And, harsh as it may sound, but if someone uses a tool which causes significant waste of time (and does not want to invest time to learn better tools), s/he should be ok with other people wasting their time, too.
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:06 comment added Erbureth @mbork changing the subject line is a bad idea, it should always be descriptive so the recipient always knows which problem it refers to. Only adding the tag to the subject line is OK
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:03 comment added mbork What about sending an email with subject like "Thank you very much! [EOM]". The first time one encounters this acronym, there is a one-time overhead of checking what that means; then the persons says to him/herself: "Ah, that's clever!", starts using it and the easy way to save people's time spreads further;-).
Dec 4, 2014 at 15:23 comment added Trylks I always thank in advance for several reasons but mainly this one.
Dec 4, 2014 at 14:36 answer added David Z timeline score: 6
Dec 3, 2014 at 23:24 comment added Jeromy Anglim See also: Is it appropriate to reply every time to a professor's “thank you” email?
Dec 3, 2014 at 22:42 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/540274936938766336
Dec 3, 2014 at 21:41 comment added ff524 Related: Etiquette on sending a thank you e-mail to respondents who gave me helpful information
Dec 3, 2014 at 21:40 history edited ff524
edited tags
Dec 3, 2014 at 20:37 history edited jakebeal
edited tags
Dec 3, 2014 at 20:37 answer added jakebeal timeline score: 46
Dec 3, 2014 at 20:31 review First posts
Dec 3, 2014 at 20:36
Dec 3, 2014 at 20:26 history asked Constantin CC BY-SA 3.0