Timeline for Is it appropriate to ask colleagues opinions when reviewing a paper?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2017 at 18:09 | answer | added | StrongBad | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 3, 2014 at 14:48 | vote | accept | nivag | ||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 22:09 | answer | added | cbeleites | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 10:56 | comment | added | Raphael | If you can't talk about reviews, how do you learn how to review well? (Maybe that's one reason for why so many reviews seem to be bad.) | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 6:20 | comment | added | ff524 | @Parsa that could be an answer to this question, but it's still a different question. Also, the answers to the linked question cite the need for several independent reviews as a main reason for saying it isn't allowed, and that reason doesn't apply here. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 6:16 | comment | added | enthu | @ff524 but as I read some papers about the ethics of peer review, there is no exception whether two people are reviewers of the same paper and journal, they are colleagues and friends or they are just people with similar research interests. The review process should remain secure and can only be discussed with the journal's editor; despite some cases that the editor allows the reviewers extra freedom for discussion and etc. This is something that only happens between an editor and the person he chooses for paper review. | |
| Jul 2, 2014 at 6:04 | comment | added | ff524 | @Parsa The linked question is about discussing with another assigned reviewer, which has different ethical and practical implications from discussing with another person who isn't an assigned reviewer. | |
| S Jul 2, 2014 at 3:29 | history | suggested | Aaron Hall | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed is, expanded a contraction, properly listed dependant clauses
|
| Jul 2, 2014 at 2:26 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jul 2, 2014 at 3:29 | |||||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 1:39 | comment | added | Floris | Since it is "for review" I would say that sharing "for review only" is appropriate as it ought to produce a better review. And I suspect that your advisor may be doing this in part for the learning experience it gives you, and not because he/she thinks a good review is impossible without your input. | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 19:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 2, 2014 at 3:54 | |||||
| Jul 1, 2014 at 18:55 | comment | added | enthu | possible duplicate of Are reviewers allowed to discuss their review with each other? | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 18:50 | answer | added | enthu | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 17:59 | comment | added | Oswald Veblen | I think it makes a large difference whether it is an advisor talking with their graduate student, or whether it is a professor at one institution asking a colleague at another institution. The latter would be very unusual - if I couldn't referee a paper without asking someone else, I would decline to referee it. | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 17:41 | answer | added | Aaron | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 17:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/484023144324530176 | ||
| Jul 1, 2014 at 16:55 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 15:14 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 15:07 | answer | added | Dmitry Savostyanov | timeline score: 15 | |
| Jul 1, 2014 at 14:46 | history | asked | nivag | CC BY-SA 3.0 |