Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 10, 2020 at 6:50 comment added Matsmath Who is going to be the reviewer, if you only reference century old papers? The list of references serves as a signpost to the Editors who to assign as a reviewer.
Nov 9, 2014 at 16:19 answer added yo' timeline score: 0
Nov 9, 2014 at 13:07 answer added Oswald Veblen timeline score: 3
Nov 9, 2014 at 10:32 history edited enthu CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body; edited title
Jun 28, 2014 at 23:56 answer added Tom Au timeline score: 1
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:47 history edited Peter Jansson
edited tags
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:37 history edited Peter Jansson
added appropriate tag
Jun 28, 2014 at 22:36 answer added Peter Jansson timeline score: 3
Jun 28, 2014 at 8:50 vote accept python dude
Jun 28, 2014 at 7:23 answer added xLeitix timeline score: 9
Jun 27, 2014 at 22:51 comment added user1482 One of the most common hallmarks of papers by cranks and kooks is that they don't cite recent work in the field. For example, this happens with anti-relativity kooks who only cite work from 1930 and before.
Jun 27, 2014 at 21:07 answer added Henry timeline score: 27
Jun 27, 2014 at 21:03 history edited Henry
edited tags
Jun 27, 2014 at 20:04 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/482615514439905280
Jun 27, 2014 at 19:54 history edited python dude CC BY-SA 3.0
added 427 characters in body
Jun 27, 2014 at 19:43 comment added JeffE it seemed to me that the recent literature didn't add much — Then you should have argued in your paper that recent literature on the topic is irrelevant, with citations to the recent literature to back up your argument.
Jun 27, 2014 at 18:10 answer added Alexandros timeline score: 15
Jun 27, 2014 at 18:07 review First posts
Jun 27, 2014 at 18:36
Jun 27, 2014 at 17:51 history asked python dude CC BY-SA 3.0