Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 14, 2016 at 1:51 comment added Blaisorblade To be sure: in related situations, I've wondered whether there's a conflict of interest pushing the author to reject the paper to publish his one.
Jun 13, 2014 at 18:00 vote accept Koldito
Jun 13, 2014 at 17:28 answer added user40480 timeline score: 5
Jun 13, 2014 at 17:00 comment added Pete L. Clark @JackAidley: There is also the ethical concern that the OP gave what amounts to a negative evaluation of the paper (a measured one, but the way these things work one presumes the journal will not publish it), but at the same time the paper has turned out to be -- somewhat indirectly -- of real value to him. I think his instinct of inquiring how to behave honorably here is a good one.
Jun 13, 2014 at 16:11 history edited aeismail CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 116 characters in body
Jun 13, 2014 at 16:01 answer added Nate Eldredge timeline score: 76
Jun 13, 2014 at 15:28 comment added Bill Barth The issue lies in the idea that you can't cite to a non-public source. If there were a pre-print on the web, you can cite to that as the source of your inspiration even if the pre-print turned out to be wrong. On the other hand, you have a duty of confidence in an article you receive for review. It doesn't really exist outside the review process.
Jun 13, 2014 at 15:18 comment added Jack Aidley I'm not sure why you think this is a special case? Had you read the paper in pre-print and come up with the same idea would you have a problem then? I'm not sure where you think the issue lies?
Jun 13, 2014 at 14:15 comment added Arno Is there a preprint of the paper available, or any other way how you could have learnt about their work beside being a referee?
Jun 13, 2014 at 13:25 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/477441523907194881
Jun 13, 2014 at 13:08 answer added brechmos timeline score: 4
Jun 13, 2014 at 13:07 history edited ff524
edited tags
Jun 13, 2014 at 12:49 history asked Koldito CC BY-SA 3.0