Timeline for Is it ethical for advisors to automatically coauthor papers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2023 at 21:34 | comment | added | Karl | The term "unethical" is bullshit. Is it morally wrong to not give coauthorship to the mentor? Of course not, because the math community does not expect it. | |
| S Feb 12, 2021 at 12:53 | history | edited | GoodDeeds | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed minor grammar issue
|
| S Feb 12, 2021 at 12:53 | history | suggested | Jake | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed minor grammar issue
|
| Feb 11, 2021 at 18:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 12, 2021 at 12:53 | |||||
| Apr 16, 2014 at 18:07 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | The point is that this unethical aspect, while certainly arguable, is on the community itself. A given advisor that would not follow the custom would put a strong handicap on its PhD students. | |
| Apr 16, 2014 at 12:40 | comment | added | Raphael | Well, in case there was significant input by the advisor, this is unethical as well. | |
| Apr 15, 2014 at 19:42 | history | answered | Benoît Kloeckner | CC BY-SA 3.0 |