Timeline for Submitted to journal, rebuttal period now ongoing but no feedback from referees yet
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:55 | comment | added | Buffy | Echoing @Dawn, yes, editors know who you are. It is only reviewers who are anonymous and they may know who you are as well except in double blind review. It is usually the reviewers that are anonymous, not the authors. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:54 | comment | added | a throwaway account | @Dawn also worth mentioning is that, if I contacted the editor directly with my name, they would know exactly which paper I submitted. Unsure if that changes anything. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:53 | comment | added | Buffy | If they expect rebuttal without feedback they have failed in their basic task. Ask for clarification and for when you might get feedback. Something may have happened that caused a failure of communication. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:45 | comment | added | Dawn | In my field, there is no expectation of anonymity with the editor, only the referees. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:44 | comment | added | a throwaway account | As for contacting the editor, any comments on my other questions regarding how to avoid breaking anonymity? | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:41 | comment | added | a throwaway account | The journal in question follows a hybrid journal/conference model, so they have strict deadlines for publication of each volume so they can be presented in the conference later this year (whose date, of course, is already set in stone). The journal/conference website pretty clearly states February 20 to 24 as the rebuttal period. | |
| Feb 20, 2023 at 15:37 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |