Timeline for Presenting non-significant results at a conference?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2023 at 19:25 | comment | added | Lodinn | "You should design studies where either a significant or non-significant result is interesting" - I can not stress it enough how important this step is for a research career. Almost an open secret of the academic world: for some reason, everyone seems to teach how to design a correct study, but almost never a good one. | |
| Jan 23, 2023 at 18:35 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Buffy The biggest problem is with underpowered studies where no individual study provides useful evidence in any direction, yet where a sufficient number of such studies are performed such that those that spuriously provide evidence of a particular hypothesis get published as evidence of interesting large effects. | |
| Jan 23, 2023 at 18:32 | comment | added | Buffy | Evidence contrary to the hypothesis is just as valuable as any other. | |
| Jan 23, 2023 at 18:22 | history | answered | Bryan Krause♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |