Timeline for How to handle a 7 days time limit for major revisions over Christmas?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 28, 2022 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1608160858378493953 | ||
Dec 28, 2022 at 16:13 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 15:09 | comment | added | Allure | @BryanKrause You have said "I am suggesting that their hyper-accelerated review schedule is intended to get money in their pockets quickly with little care for quality", but you have not been able to suggest a mechanism whereby hyper-accelerated review results in "little care for quality". You could say it's strawman, I suppose - but it's what you've written. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 14:52 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Allure I don't understand why you keep inventing straw man arguments that I have supposedly made, and I assure you that this argument style does not inspire confidence. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 14:24 | comment | added | Allure | @BryanKrause are you suggesting MDPI are able to control what their reviewers write? Because I am not seeing a mechanism which links a journal's average review time with quality. Conversely, if taking longer implies higher quality, all journals would just sit on their hands for a few months before starting review. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 14:02 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Allure No, I am suggesting that their hyper-accelerated review schedule is intended to get money in their pockets quickly with little care for quality. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 14:00 | comment | added | Allure | @BryanKrause Are you suggesting MDPI write their own reviews and fake them as written by actual reviewers? | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 13:52 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Allure Indeed, and from what I can tell that hyper-accelerated schedule is all about getting money in their pocket with little care for quality. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 13:03 | comment | added | Allure | @BryanKrause there are people/cultures in the world that don't celebrate Christmas. This also sounds like an MDPI journal, i.e. runs on a hyper-accelerated schedule. | |
Dec 28, 2022 at 8:56 | answer | added | Flaming Ducks | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 22:52 | history | became hot network question | |||
Dec 27, 2022 at 17:32 | history | edited | Buffy |
edited tags
|
|
S Dec 27, 2022 at 15:36 | history | suggested | CrimsonDark | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Simple corrections from non-native English to native English speaker.
|
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:23 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | @Snijderfrey The issue is less about the 7 day time limit (which is in fact short), but about the unlikelihood that a paper submitted last week would already be reviewed properly by now. | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:22 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | @Snijderfrey I meant the interval between submission and Dec. 23 reply, not the 7-day deadline | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:22 | comment | added | Snijderfrey | The answers here might help you: Request an extension of revision deadline over the holidays or Asking for extension in submission of revision | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:21 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 27, 2022 at 15:36 | |||||
Dec 27, 2022 at 15:17 | history | edited | Snijderfrey | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Made title more descriptive
|
Dec 27, 2022 at 14:57 | history | edited | Buffy |
edited tags
|
|
Dec 27, 2022 at 14:54 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 14:52 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | You received a review in less than a week, at Christmastime? Are you sure this is a legitimate journal? Although I suppose why would they bother with revisions? | |
Dec 27, 2022 at 14:49 | history | asked | AnnaBanana | CC BY-SA 4.0 |